2017 Theoretical and Experimental Institute on Rift Initiation and Evolution


icon-mHotel Albuquerque, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Alvarado Ballroom D
February 8-10, 2017

 icon-download Read the report

 

AnnouncementAgenda | Presentation archiveStudent & Postdoc SymposiumField TripMore info

The Theoretical and Experimental Institute (TEI) for the Rift Initiation and Evolution (RIE) initiative is now open for applications. The TEI will be held over three full days from February 8-10, 2017 and is intended to summarize progress and recent scientific advances related to the RIE initiative, and to identify high-priority science for future GeoPRISMS RIE efforts. (Please see the Science and Implementation Plan). Applicants do not need to have worked on projects funded by GeoPRISMS. We expect a broad and diverse audience drawn from domestic and international research communities, including graduate students and early career scientists, who are interested in the initiation and evolution of rifts.

Funding

The TEI is funded by the National Science Foundation through the GeoPRISMS Office at The Pennsylvania State University. There is no registration fee. We will be able to cover most on-site expenses (venue costs, hotel expenses based on double occupancy, and breakfast & lunch) for approximately 80 participants. Most participants will have to cover their travel to and from the meeting; partial funding for travel is available for students and postdocs. We will not be able to provide dinners on-site, but there are several restaurants nearby. Confirmed participants whose on-site expenses are covered are expected to arrive on Tuesday evening and leave on Saturday morning.

Organizing Committee

Tobias Fischer (University of New Mexico)
Donna Shillington (LDEO/Columbia University)
Estella Atekwana (Oklahoma State University)
Rebecca Bendick (University of Montana)
Juliet Biggs (University of Bristol)
Esteban Gazel (Virginia Tech)
Liz Hajek (Pennsylvania State University)
Luc Lavier (University of Texas, Austin)

Ex officio: Demian Saffer (GeoPRISMS Office/Pennsylvania State University)

Important Dates

October 4: Applications are opened
November 21: Application deadline
December 9: Successful applicants are invited to confirm participation
December 22: Deadline for confirmation of attendance
Late January: Final meeting agenda is released

Feb 7 – Student and Postdoc Symposium

(Alvarado Ballroom A+B)

1:00: Welcome & overview of GeoPRISMS and NSF – Demian Saffer (PSU) and Jennifer Wade (NSF)
1:30: Overview of RIE science questions – James Muirhead (Syracuse) and Yelebe Birhanu (Bristol)
2:00: 1 min, 1 slide pop ups on research related to RIE (part 1)
2:30: Career opportunities panel
3:00: Coffee break
3:15: 1 min, 1 slide pop ups on research related to RIE (part 2)
3:45: Group discussion
5:00: Concluding remarks
5:00-7:00: Ice breaker and student & postdoc posters


Feb 8 – Day 1

7:00 Breakfast (Franciscan Ballroom)

8:00 Welcome from GeoPRISMS Office & NSF | Demian Saffer and Jennifer Wade (Alvarado Ballrooms D & E)

8:15 Introduction to the RIE TEI | Tobias Fischer (UNM) and Donna Shillington (LDEO)

8:30 Session 1 | Rift evolution from initiation to post rift architecture

  • A brief history of ideas about rifting and the controversial role of magma in rift initiation | Roger Buck (LDEO) – Keynote (20 min)
  • Controls on continental rifting processes from geophysical observations at mature margins | Harm Van Avendonk (UTIG) – Keynote (20 min)
  • The interplay between morphodynamics and substrate fluid flow– An examination of active processes along passive margins | Danny Brothers (USGS) – Keynote (20 min)
  • Panel discussion with moderator – 30 min

10:00 Break

10:30 Session 2 | Geodynamics

  • Geodynamic models of rifting | Jolante Van Wijk (New Mexico Tech) – Keynote (20 min)
  • The Woodlark Rift: a case study in young continental breakup | Zach Eilon (Brown) – 15 min
  • Mineral-scale constraints on the geodynamics of rifting | Andrew Smye (Penn State) – 15 min
  • Results of a high resolution heat flow survey across the Wagner Basin, Gulf of California | Robert Harris (Oregon State U) – 15 min
  • Seismic anisotropy across the Eastern North American Margin (ENAM) | Colton Lynner (U. Arizona) – 15 min
  • Panel discussion – 20 min

12:10 Lunch (Franciscan)

1:10 Report from Student Symposium and Break out 1 intro (Alvarado Ballroom D & E)

1:30 Break out 1 | Science gaps and priorities (Alvarado Ballrooms A, B, F, D & E, view the break out groups assignment)

2:30 Break

3:00 Session 3 | Magmatism, volcanism and volatile exchanges (Alvarado Ballrooms D & E)

4:30 Pop Up #1 (give 1 min summaries of posters)

James Conder | Popup
Luel Emishaw | Popup
John Greene | Popup

5:00 – Poster/cash bar & Posters

John Greene | Poster
Erin Heilman | Poster
Lisa Lamb | Poster
Madison Myers | Poster

Dinner on your own


Feb 9 – Day 2

7:30 Breakfast (Franciscan)

8:30 Session 4 | Faulting and Strain (Alvarado Ballrooms D & E)

10:10 Break

10:40 Poster pop ups #2

11:10 Breakout reports & discussion

12:00 Lunch (Franciscan)

1:00 Session 5 | Surface processes and feedbacks with lithospheric processes

  • Lost in translation: Defining thresholds for signal storage in landscapes and stratigraphy | Kyle Straub (Tulane) – Keynote 20 min
  • The role of surface processes in stabilizing half-graben structures | Jean-Arthur Olive (LDEO) – 15 min
  • Stratigraphic record of rift development at the Ledi-Geraru paleontological site, Afar, Ethiopia | Erin DiMaggio (Penn State) – 15 min
  • The effects of rapid sedimentation upon continental breakup: Seismic imaging and thermal modeling of the Salton Trough, Southern California | Liang Han (UTIG) – 15 mins
  • Rift tectonics and sedimentation: Insights from an onshore-offshore synthesis of the Corinth Rift, Greece | Rob Gawthorpe (Bergen / CSM) – 15 min
  • Panel discussion – 20 min

2:40 Break

3:00 Poster session

5:00 cash bar

7:00 Conference Dinner (Alvarado Ballroom E)

8:00 – 8:30 Overview of the Rio Grande Rift (Karl Karlstrom and Laura Crossey, UNM, Alvarado Ballroom E)


Feb 10 – Day 3

7:30 Breakfast (Tablao)

8:30 Session 6 | Hazards at rifts and rifted margins (Alvarado Ballroom D & E)

10:00 Break

10:30 Session 7 | Collaborative opportunities

  • Rift Volcanism: Past, Present and Future | Juliet Biggs (University of Bristol)
  • Wide rifting: From tectonics through surface processes, surface and groundwater hydrology to endemic spring biota | Gary Axen (New Mexico Tech)
  • EarthScope updates | Donna Shillington (LDEO)
  • Africa Array updates | Andrew Nyblade (Penn State)

12:00 Lunch (Alvarado Ballrooms B & C)

1:00 Intro to Breakout 2

1:30 Breakout 2 | High priority data gaps / work needed to address science questions (Alvarado Ballrooms B, C, F, D & E)

2:30 Break

3:00 Short reports of breakout (1 slide one most exciting thing discussed) / Plenary Discussion

5:00 Concluding remarks – Tobias Fischer (UNM) and Donna Shillington (LDEO)

5:30 Meeting adjourns


Feb 11 – Field Trip

8:00 am Breakfast (Fireplace)

9:00 am Board the bus in front of the hotel with your box lunch.

~4:30 pm arrive at hotel.

Upload your pop-up slides before Friday February 3!

On Tuesday before the TEI we will hold a student and postdoc symposium which will feature short presentations by attendees and discussion with the conveners and NSF program managers. The symposium runs from 1:00 – 5:00 and will be followed at 5:00 – 7:00 by student posters and cash bar. We encourage all students and postdocs to attend and to arrange their travel accordingly, after confirmation of attendance.

1:00: Welcome & overview of GeoPRISMS and NSF – Demian Saffer (PSU) and Jennifer Wade (NSF)
1:30: Overview of RIE science questions – James Muirhead (Syracuse) and Yelebe Birhanu (Bristol)
2:00: 1 min, 1 slide pop ups on research related to RIE (part 1)
2:30: Career opportunities panel
3:00: Coffee break
3:15: 1 min, 1 slide pop ups on research related to RIE (part 2)
3:45: Group discussion
5:00: Concluding remarks
5:00-7:00: Ice breaker and student & postdoc posters

Kasha Katuwe Tent Rocks National Monument, NM. credit: Bureau of Land Management

We will organize an optional field trip to the nearby (~1 hour drive from Albuquerque) Kasha-Katuwe National Monument in the Jemez Volcanic field to look at pyroclastic volcanic deposits and get an overview of the Rio Grande Rift. This trip will involve some light hiking.

Departure: 9:00 am in front of the hotel main entrance.
Return: ~4:30 pm to the hotel

If the conditions allow we will go to Kasha Katuwe (Tent Rocks). If there is too much snow, we will go to an alternative location at lower elevation. The elevation at Kasha Katuwe ranges from 5,500 to 6,700 feet and we will hike to 6,700. It is a nice hike with a great view from the top. We will be in a national monument, so no hammering on rocks or collecting of materials. It can be cold and windy and it can also be very sunny so be prepared for changing weather conditions and wear some layers.

Meeting venue: The Hotel Albuquerque in Albuquerque, NM

The Himalayan Seismogenic Zone (HSZ)


    icon-map-marker Grand Hyatt Union Square San Francisco
345 Stockton Street, San Francisco, CA
Sunset Room – 36th Floor
Tuesday December 15, 2015, 7 – 9pm

Conveners: Larry Brown, Judith Hubbard, Marianne Karplus, Simon Klemperer, Hiroshi Sato

icon-file-text-o Participant list

AgendaMeeting objectives
7:00 | Welcome and refreshments – Larry Brown
7:05 | Session I: Persistent issues of Himalayan tectonics – Jean-Philippe Avouac
7:20 | Discussion on key scientific questions – Simon Klemperer
7:40 | Break
7:50 | Session II: Seismic hazards and mitigation in the Himalayan region – Judith Hubbard
8:05 | Discussion on seismicity and seismic hazard – Marianne Karplus
8:30 | Session III: Organizational strategies for future action – Greg Moore
8:45 | Final discussion – Judith Hubbard
9:00 | End for formal session

The Mw 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake that occurred on April 25 of this year was a dramatic reminder that great earthquakes are not restricted to the large seismogenic zones associated with subduction of oceanic lithosphere. The latter have been the foci of a number of major geoscience initiatives over the past several decades, most notably the MARGINS SEIZE program, as well as the host of several recent great earthquakes, including the Mw 9.0 Tohoku earthquake of 2011 and the Mw 8.8 earthquake of Maule, Chile in 2010. The Himalayas seismogenic zone is in many respects the continental counterpart to these largely marine systems. As such it not only represents important scientific and societal issues in its own right, it constitutes a reference for evaluating general models of the earthquake cycle derived from the studies of the oceanic subduction systems.

The Himalayan seismogenic zone shares with its oceanic counterparts a number of fundamental questions with respect to the accumulation of strain and its release by major earthquakes. These include:

a) What controls the updip and downdip limits of rupture?
b) What controls the lateral segmentation of rupture zones (and hence magnitude)?
c) What is the role of fluids in facilitating slip and or rupture?
d) What nucleates rupture (e..g. asperities?)?
e) What physical properties can be monitored as precursors to future events?
f) How effectively can the radiation pattern of future events be modeled?

However the underthrusting of continental, as opposed to oceanic, lithosphere in the Himalayas frames these questions in a very different context:

g) How does the greater thickness and weaker rheology of continental crust/lithosphere affect locking of the seismogenic zone?
h) How does the different thermal structure of continental vs oceanic crust affect earthquake geodynamics?
i) Are fluids a significant factor in intercontinental thrusting?
j) How does the basement morphology of underthrust continental crust affect locking/creep, and how does it differ from the oceanic case?
k) What is the significance of blind splay faulting in accommodating slip?
l) Do lithologic contrasts juxtaposed across the continental seismogenic zone play a role in the rheological behavior of the SZ in the same manner as proposed for the ocean SZ?
m) How can a better understanding of Himalayan rupture be translated into more cost effective preparations for the next major event in this region?

Major differences in the study of the continental vs oceanic seismogenic zone also relate to the opportunities for new geological observations. In contrast to the study of submarine seismogenic zones which lie beneath many klimoters of water, Himalaya structures are open to:

a) direct geological observation via field mapping
b) dense and wide aperture monitoring of surface strain via GPS and INSAR
c) extensive sampling of geofluids via surface flows and shallow drill holes
d) cost effective deployment of long term geophysical arrays (e.g. seismic and MT) designed to detect subtle variations if physical properties within the seismogenic zone, and ultimately,
e) a fixed platform for deep drilling of past and future rupture zones

The only logistical advantage of the marine environment for the study of the seismogenic zone is the relatively lower cost of multichannel seismic reflection profiling that forms the backbone of such initiatives. However, that advantage may be offset in part by new recording technologies for land acquisition, especially for 3D surveys. Moreover, in some respects the “fixed” land environment is more amenable for the design of cost-effective time lapse geophysical monitoring.

It remains to be established whether the Himalayan seismogenic zone has the potential for earthquakes of the greatest magnitudes (e.g. 9.0+). However, there is no question that future ruptures in this system represent a serious threat to major population centers (megacities) in the India subcontinent. For this reason alone the HSZ is  deserving of a major effort exploiting the new generation of geophysical and geological tools.

International Imperative

Any Himalayan Seismogenic Zone effort will be international by the very nature of the target. Certainly one on the scale envisioned here will require the substantial resources that only a multinational consortium can rally. It must also respect the interests of the scientists and authorities of the countries most affected, especially Nepal, Bhutan and India, and should take advantage of special scientific assets in the regional. The workshop being proposed is a first step toward identifying and organizing these diverse interests and resources.

Interdisciplinary Foci

Experience with the MARGINS SEIZE initiative as well as numerous individual investigator efforts have clearly demonstrated the desirability of integrating results from multiple approaches. The most obvious components include: multichannel seismic reflection detailing of structure, wide-angle seismic measurements of physical properties (e.g. bulk P and S wave velocity, reflector AVO, attenuation, anisotropy), passive seismic measurement of gross structure and physical properties (e.g. anisotropy), MT measurements of conductivity, laboratory measurements of relevant physical properties of local samples, field geological mapping of relevant surface structure and lithology, monitoring of ground water geochemistry, mapping and monitoring of heat flow, GPS and INSAR monitoring of surface strain accumulation and geodynamic modeling of realistic crustal structure. A particularly exciting prospect is time lapse seismic /MT imaging of subtle changes in physical properties within previous and potential future rupture zones.

GeoPRISMS

Virtually all of the issues outlined above relate explicitly to the goals of GeoPRISMS as summarized in its Mission Statement: GeoPRISMS investigates the coupled geodynamics, earth surface processes, and climate interactions that build and modify continental margins over a wide range of timescales (from s to My), and across the shoreline. GeoPRISMS research has applications to margin evolution and dynamics, construction of stratigraphic architecture, accumulation of economic resources, and associated geologic hazards and environmental management. The Himalayas are the global icon of the end member evolution of convergent continental margins in general. Understanding seismogenesis in this setting is not only critical to evaluating seismic hazards resulting from continent-continent collision, but the processes that control major earthquake ruptures in oceanic subduction zones as well. Moreover the “shoreline” here is exposed to direct geological examination in a way that contemporary marine “proto-equivalents” are not.

The workshop will be open to all interested individuals. Researchers at early stages in their career are especially encouraged to attend.

References

Bilham, R., V. Gaur, and P. Molnar, 2001, Himalayan Seismic Hazard, Science, 293, 1442-1444.
Cattin, R. and J.-P. Avouac, 2000, Modeling mountain building and the seismic sycle in the Himalaya of Nepac, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 13389-13407.

From rifting to drifting: evidence from rifts and margins worldwide mini-workshop


 icon-map-marker Grand Hyatt San Francisco
345 Stockton Street, San Francisco, CA
Union Square Room – 36th Floor

Sunday December 13, 2015, 8 – 1:30pm

Conveners: Rebecca Bendick, Ian Bastow, Tyrone Rooney, Harm van Avendonk, Jolante van Wijk

 icon-file-text-o Participant list

AgendaMeeting objectivesSTEPPE WorkshopMeeting report

Topic 1: Melt Generation in Extensional Environments
8:00-8:30 | Overview talk by Tyrone Rooney
8:30-8:45 | Panel discussion moderated by Harm van Avendonk

Topic 2: Magma-lithosphere interaction
8:45-9:15: Magma-lithosphere interaction | Chris Havlin
9:15-9:30: Panel discussion moderated by Ian Bastow

9:30-10 | Coffee

Topic 3: Stretching the lithosphere
10:00-10:30 | Stretching of the lithosphere |  Suzon Jammes
10:30-10:45 | Panel discussion moderated by Rebecca Bendick

Topic 4: Rifting and Oceanic Spreading
10:45-11:15 | Rifting and oceanic spreading – the focusing of melt delivery in space and time – Derek Keir
11:15-11:30 | Panel discussion moderated by Jolante van Wijk

11:30-12:30 | Lunch outside the venue

Discussion
12:30-13:00 | Summary of current results
13:00-13:30 | Avenues for future study

The purpose of this workshop is to facilitate discussion on the current state of research into continental extension. Our aim is to be broadly inclusive by bringing an audience with widely varying backgrounds to a common understanding of the state of the art in this field. Our ultimate goal will then be to pursue a discussion on future research challenges for the community and how these challenges align with the existing science plans for the GeoPRISMS Eastern North America and East African Rift Focus Sites. We will organize this meeting around the following themes:

  1. Melt generation in extensional environments: Mantle decompression, thermal state and composition of the mantle.
  2. Magma-lithosphere interaction: diking, metasomatism, thermal weakening, changing the composition of the lithosphere, coupling between deformation and melt migration.
  3. Stretching of the lithosphere: Strain localization in brittle and ductile rheology,  rates of extension, punctuated events.
  4. Feedback loops – rifting and surface processes: sedimentation, margin architecture
  5. Rifting and oceanic spreading – the missing link: Lithospheric breakup, focusing of melt delivery,  evolution of mantle deformation
Conveners:
Rebecca Bendick (University of Montana)
Ian Bastow (Imperial College London)
Tyrone Rooney (Michigan State University)
Harm van Avendonk (Univ. Texas Institute for Geophysics, UT-Austin)
Jolante van Wijk (New Mexico Tech)

Conveners: Michael McGlue and Christopher Scholz

Description: This STEPPE workshop will investigate source-to-sink processes through an examination of the Lake Tanganyika rift (East Africa), which faithfully records profound signals of tectonics, climate variability, and surface processes in a high-continuity sedimentary archive. The workshop will bring together inter-disciplinary experts to discuss the geodynamic, atmospheric, hydrologic, and biological processes affecting the Tanganyika hinterland that influence sediment generation and transport, as well as the limnological and depositional processes influencing stratal architecture and the composition of sediment. Lake Tanganyika is widely considered to be the premier target to recover a long-term, high resolution record of tropical climate, evolutionary biology, and rift tectonics via scientific drilling, and it is also an active frontier petroleum basin. The goal of the workshop is to lay the framework for future scientific drilling and consider the best pathways for deconvolving forcing mechanisms from the depositional signal, potentially through the application of new analytical techniques, integration of large digital datasets, or process modeling. Interested participants (especially early career scientists – students, post-docs, etc.) are encouraged to participate and contact the conveners for more information (michael.mcglue@uky.edu or cascholz@syr.edu).

From rifting to drifting: evidence from rifts and margins worldwide mini-workshop

AGU Fall Meeting 2015, San Francisco, USA

Conveners: Rebecca Bendick1, Ian Bastow2, Tyrone Rooney3, Harm van Avendonk4, Jolante van Wijk5

1University of Montana, 2Imperial College London, 3Michigan State University, 4Univ. Texas Institute for Geophysics, UT-Austin, 5New Mexico Tech

On Sunday December 13, 2015, from 8am to 1:30pm, a representative cross section of researchers interested in rifting met in the Grand Hyatt San Francisco before the AGU Fall Meeting. Our primary focus was to facilitate discussion on the current state of research into continental extension. Our aim was to be broadly inclusive by bringing an audience with widely varying backgrounds to a common understanding of the state of the art in this field. Our ultimate goal was to initiate a discussion on future research challenges for the community and how these challenges align with the existing science plans for the GeoPRISMS Eastern North America and East African Rift Focus Sites. To facilitate community building and cross disciplinary linkages, the meeting was coordinated with the STEPPE consortium (Sedimentary Geology, Time, Environment, Paleontology, Paleoclimatology, Energy) workshop investigating source-to-sink processes of the Lake Tanganyika rift (East Africa), which took place directly following the GeoPRISMS workshop from 2 to 8pm.

The meeting was structured to allow for discussion under four broad subheadings:

Topic 1: Melt Generation in Extensional Environments

A 30 minute introduction to this topic was presented by Tyrone Rooney. The talk covered the historical context of rifting studies and then focused on the relationship between magma and lithospheric strength. The concept of magma within the lithosphere facilitating rifting was introduced. The presentation examined how magmas provide an important temporal record of mantle processes during extension. It was shown how thermochemical constraints of the upper mantle source region of rift magmas could be probed with erupted lavas. In particular, the dual challenges of mantle potential temperature and pyroxenites in the upper mantle were highlighted as important frontiers in our understanding of mantle melting processes. The role of volatiles in some rifting environments (Rio Grande Rift) was introduced. The role of magmas in influencing seismic images of the upper mantle and also acting as a mechanism of strain accommodation during late stage rifting was also discussed. Finally, an examination of the continental lithospheric mantle as a possible magma source was also presented.
The discussion, moderated by Harm van Avendonk, first explored the issue of the role of water in magma generation processes. In particular, there were questions asked about the storage of water in water-bearing phases but also the ability of olivine to store volatiles. Further discussions continued on the role of hydrous phases on lithospheric rheology. The first key question arising from these discussion was – where could volatiles reside and how much in the source of rift magmas (especially water and carbon dioxide). Suggestions on approaching this question through studies of xenoliths and reconstructing lithospheric architecture were made. The second key question focused on the role of structural inheritance. It was acknowledged that crustal heterogeneity and mantle lithosphere heterogeneity may not necessarily correspond. Finally the third key question related to the amount of melt generation with the timing and magnitude of stretching.

Topic 2: Magma-lithosphere interaction

A 30 minute introduction to this topic was presented by Chris Havlin. This presentation first delivered an overview of the physics and thermodynamics of melt transport. This was further subdivided on the basis of porous flow within the mantle and lithosphere and in terms of crustal fractures and channels and how lithospheric inheritance influenced melt transport. The porous flow concept was expanded to examine the dependence on pressure gradients, buoyancy and dynamic pressure. The concept of a ‘freezing boundary’ was raised in terms of a melt focusing mechanism, which if dipping, could redistribute melt. Within the lithosphere the concept of lithospheric and crustal fabrics was raised. It was acknowledged that grain size may affect porosity and surface tension. As a result, melt is preferentially directed into smaller grain size domains. The presentation also examined end-member models of strain i.e. whole lithospheric heating, and basal heating and impact of the porosity front shallowing over time creating an effective thinning of the lithosphere. Finally, it was shown that there could be a growing zone of modified lithosphere whereby mechanically it behaves as does the asthenosphere but chemically it may still resemble the lithospheric mantle.
The discussion, moderated by Ian Bastow, first examined the concept of the background state of stress in rifting environments and how stress may change with changes in viscosity. It was noted that thinning does not require large extensional stresses. A point was raised on the competing grain size effects on porosity and surface area in relation to bulk permeability. Questions were raised by the group as what happens in relation to thinning and melt alteration of the lithosphere in seemingly amagmatic rift segments. It was acknowledged, however, that segments defined as amagmatic due to a lack of surface volcanism may still possess significant melt at depth within the lithosphere. As a result of these discussions, two key questions arose: (1) What is the role of melt in magmatic and amagmatic (in terms of surface volcanism) rift segments? and (2) What are the feedbacks between melt transport and lithospheric thinning and what are the mechanisms?

Topic 3: Stretching the lithosphere

A 30+ minute introduction to this topic was presented by Suzon Jammes. The presentation first examined the concept of mechanical stretching and the genetic relationship of stretching as an important factor in the Wilson Cycle. The factors controlling this mechanical stretching focused on exhumation, tectonic inheritance, and the control of rift and margin architecture. The topic of depth-dependant stretching was examined and how vertical decoupling was incompatible with pure and simple shear endmembers. An introduction to time-dependant stretching mechanisms followed with some idealized cross section of basinward migration of deformation. Dr. Jammes presented an evolutionary model whereby mechanical stretching was followed by the creation of a ‘necking zone’ for major crustal thinning and finally an exhumation phase. The discussion continued into a discussion of how rifting processes are determined by rheological layering of the lithosphere and the impact of structural inheritance and sensitivity to this vertical layering.

The discussion, moderated by Rebecca Bendick, was more limited due to time constraints but did establish a key question of how the feedbacks with melting might vary in terms of the recognized global variety of architectures of rifts and rifted margins.

Topic 4: Melt delivery and focusing

A 30 minute introduction to this topic was presented by Derek Keir. Dr. Keir showed how within the East African Rift changes in mantle potential temperature are probable first order controls on magma supply. It was also shown how variations in magmatism are multi-scalar with lateral variation at several scales both in the presence and absence of melt and melt chemistry. There was a view that melt pathways and focusing might represent the best mechanism for generating smaller scale variability and examples from the Black Sea and Afar were shown. Afar provided a particularly interesting case as in this region it was show that volcanism responded to increasing subsidence. That is, the more the thinning, the more melt and thus more melt focusing. Dr. Keir showed how a mantle potential temperature anomaly of at least 100 degrees could help explain observed seismic velocities and also the presence of melt throughout the region. A comparison was made between Afar and slow spreading ridges and also to Krafla (Iceland) between 1975 and 1984. The discussion continued as to the impact of melt focusing in time and space and how it is influenced by the temporal accumulations of tectonic stresses. The result of this was described as a general migration of volcanism from the rift flanks towards the rift axis with the competing tectonic and gravitational stresses.

The discussion, moderated by Jolante van Wijk, examined comparisons between the Havlin models discussed in topic 2 and those presented by Keir in topic 4. Some discussion centered on the concept of focusing at the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary and then subsequent defocusing within the crust. It was acknowledged that geochemical data were critical to address these issues. It was noted that magmatic sources clearly differ along strike within the rift and thus are inconsistent with a single centralized source.

From rifting to drifting: evidence from rifts and margins worldwide | December 13 AGU 2015

Broad discussion

Following a break, the group reconvened to try and systematize some of the key concepts raised. The issues can be summarized as follows:

1. Rift Initiation

  • What is the role of mantle plumes?
  • How can mechanical heterogeneity facilitate initial rifting?
  • What role does chemical heterogeneity in the lithospheric mantle control initial extension?
  • What is the initial thermo-chemical structure of the lithosphere and asthenosphere in a nascent rift?
  • What does incipient rifting look like? Okavango suggests preexisting structure critical
  • Is this a top down or bottom up process? How does extension propagate?

2. Evolution of rifting in time and space

  • Why do rifts ultimately fail?
  • What is the role of nonlinear feedbacks?
  • How can datasets from igneous petrology and the sedimentary record provide a temporal insight into rift evolution?
  • What is the time evolution of strain?

3. Rift Architecture

  • How do non-uniqueness issues create difficulties in creating global models of rift evolution?
  • How can real constrains be linked with ever more innovative and detailed simulations?
  • What variables control the strength of the lithosphere?
  • What is the role of far-field vs. local controls on strain and rift evolution?

4. Volatiles in extensional environments

  • What are the volatile pathways from depth to the surface?
  • How deep are the volatiles derived from?
  • What is the role of rift valley volcanoes in global production of volatiles (e.g., CO2, SO2)?
  • How can lithospheric heterogeneity and inheritance influence the volatile budget?

In summary the basic concepts on which the group agreed that were critical for GeoPRISMS were:

  1. What is the history of melt? Where is it formed, when is it formed, why is it formed, how is it focused, and what pathways does it take through the lithosphere?
  2. What is the material (thermal and chemical) heterogeneity in the rift lithosphere? How does inheritance play a role, is there spatial organization at play, and how can we assess the importance of these heterogeneities to rifting?
  3. Comparison of focus areas is needed. How do ENAM and the EAR differ and how are they similar? What can be learned from focused studies at both sites?

2015 Theoretical and Experimental Institute on Subduction Cycles and Deformation


Portofino Hotel & Marina, Redondo Beach, CA
Bayside Ballroom
October 12-14, 2015

AnnouncementStudent & postdoc symposiumAgenda | Presentation ArchiveField tripMore info

The Theoretical and Experimental Institute (TEI) for the Subduction Cycles and Deformation (SCD) initiative is held on the three full days of October 12-14 and is intended to provide a summary of progress made in the science objectives of the SCD initiative (as discussed in the Science and Implementation plan available through geoprisms.nineplanetsllc.com). Applicants do not have to have worked on projects funded by GeoPRISMS. We expect a broad and diverse audience drawn from domestic and international researchers, including graduate students and early career scientists, who are interested in the structure and dynamics of subduction zones.

Funding

The TEI is funded by the National Science Foundation through the GeoPRISMS Office at the University of Michigan. There is no registration fee. Due to space restrictions the meeting will be strictly limited to 150 participants. We will be able to cover on-site expenses (venue costs, hotel expenses based on double occupancy, and breakfast+lunch) for up to 120 participants. Most participants will have to cover travel to and from the meeting. Partial funding for travel is available for students and postdocs. We will not be able to provide dinner on-site but there are plenty of restaurants nearby.

Confirmed participants whose on-site expenses are covered are expected to arrive on Sunday afternoon and leave on Thursday morning.

 Organizing Committee

Jeff Freymueller (University of Alaska Fairbanks)
Sarah Penniston-Dorland (University of Maryland)
Donna Shillington (Columbia/LDEO)
Kelin Wang (Pacific Geoscience Centre)
Erin Wirth (University of Washington)
Gene Yogodzinski (University of South Carolina)

Ex officio: Peter van Keken (GeoPRISMS Office/University of Michigan)

 Important Dates

 Monday July 27: Applications are invited via geoprisms.nineplanetsllc.com
 Friday August 21: Application deadline
 Friday August 28: Successful applicants are invited to confirm participation
 Friday September 11: Deadline for confirmation of attendance
 Late September: Final meeting agenda is released

Location

The Portofino hotel at Redondo Beach, CA. The hotel is located just 8 miles (13 km) south of the main Los Angeles airport (LAX). Shuttle service is available for transport from and to the airport in addition to cab services.

[put_wpgm id=3]

GeoPRISMS Student and Postdoc Symposium
 icon-map-marker Portofino Hotel, Redondo Beach, CA
Pacific Ballroom I

Sunday October 11, 2015

On Sunday before the meeting we will hold a student and postdoc symposium which will feature short presentations by the attendees and discussion with the conveners and NSF program managers. The meeting starts at 3 pm. We encourage all students and postdocs to attend and to arrange their travel accordingly, after confirmation of attendance.

PDF

3:00 – 3:10 Welcome and Symposium Objectives
3:10 – 3:30 Introduction to GeoPRISMS/Welcome from NSF – Peter van Keken (U. Michigan), Jennifer Wade (NSF)
3:30 – 3:55 The Incoming Plate & Shallow Forearc – Sarah Penniston-Dorland (U. Maryland), Peter van Keken
3:55 – 4:20 The Megathrust – Jeff Freymueller (U. Alaska)
4:20 – 4:45 The Slab, Mantle Wedge & Arc Crust – Gene Yogodzinski (U. South Carolina)
4:45 – 5:00 Coffee Break
5:00 – 5:30 Subduction Zone Observatory Discussion – Joan Gomberg (USGS)
5:30 Student Round Table Introductions
7:00 Dinner – Pacific Ballroom II

Student Symposium | Sunday, October 11

icon-caret-Introduction to GeoPRISMS / Welcome from NSF | Peter van Keken (U. Michigan), Jennifer Wade (NSF)
icon-caret-right The Incoming Plate & Shallow Forearc | Sarah Penniston-Dorland (U. Maryland), Peter van Keken
icon-caret-right The Megathrust | Jeff Freymueller (U. Alaska)
icon-caret-right The Slab, Mantle Wedge & Arc Crust | Gene Yogodzinski (U. South Carolina)
icon-caret-right Subduction Zone Observatory Discussion | Joan Gomberg (USGS)

Day 1 | Monday, October 12

 icon-caret-right Introductory to GeoPRISMS | Peter van Keken (U. of Michigan, GeoPRISMS)

 icon-caret-right Welcome from NSF | Jenn Wade (NSF)

Incoming Plate (convener: Kelin Wang)
 icon-caret-right Keynote: Geophysical constraints on incoming plate hydration | Doug Wiens (Washington University)
 icon-caret-right Invited: Deformation and strength of the incoming plate: Observations & simulations | Magali Billen (UC Davis)
 icon-caret-right The Water content of the Juan de Fuca plate entering the Cascadia Subduction margin | Pablo Canales (WHOI)

Discussion (Suzanne Carbotte)

The Shallow Forearc (convener: Donna Shillington)

Discussion (Harold Tobin)

Posters
icon-caret-right Sediment pathways across trench slopes: Results from Numerical Modeling | Milene Cormier (U Rhode Island)
icon-caret-right Recovering all geodetic strain along the Nicoya subduction interface | Christos Kyriakopoulos (UC Riverside)
icon-caret-right Crustal recycling by subduction erosion in Central Mexico | Susanne Straub (Columbia U)

Day 2 | Tuesday, October 13

The Megathrust (convener: Jeff Freymueller)
icon-caret-right Invited: Observing multiscale temporal behavior on a megathrust: Transient behavior and the 2012 Mw 7.6 seismic event | Rocco Malservisi (South Florida)
icon-caret-right Two years of deep slow slip in New Zealand, in fits and spurtsNoel Bartlow (UC San Diego)
Discussion (Susan Schwartz)
Slab Processes (convener: Sarah Penniston-Dorland)
icon-caret-righ Keynote: Slab ProcessesBrad Hacker (UC Santa Barbara)
icon-caret-right Sediment melt at the edges of the Aeolian arc: Implications for hot vs cold subduction zone models | Esteban Gazel (Virginia Tech)
icon-caret-right Effects of 3-D slab geometry and oblique subduction on mantle wedge flow and thermal structure: Examples from NE Japan | Ikuko Wada (Minnesota)
icon-caret-right Invited: Accessing slab processes through numerical models | Pierre Bouilhol (Durham U)
icon-caret-right Deformation within the subducted Nazca slab from seismic anisotropy | Caroline Eakin (Southampton)
icon-caret-right Slab melting beneath the southern Cascade Arc driven by dehydration of altered oceanic peridotite | Kristina Walowski (U of Edinburgh)
Discussion (Paul Wallace)
Posters
icon-caret-right Deep long-period earthquakes (DLPs) beneath Mount St. Helens | Jiangang Han (U of Washington)

Day 3 | Wednesday, October 14

Mantle Wedge & Arc Crust (convener: Gene Yogodzinski)

icon-caret-right Keynote: Distinctly different parental magmas for calc-alkaline plutons and tholeitiic lavas in the central and eastern Aleutian arcPeter Kelemen (Columbia U)
icon-caret-right Constructing island arc crust: the volcanic to plutonic transition in the Rosario segment of the Cretaceous Alisitos Arc, Baja, Mexico | Sue DeBari (Western Washington)
icon-caret-right Thermobarometric constraints from primitive arc magmas: A review | Christy Till (Arizona State U)
icon-caret-right Interpreting seismic anisotropy in subduction zones: The role of deformation history | Phil Skemer (Washington University)
icon-caret-right Invited: Successes and limitations in the seismic imaging of Alaskan volcanoes | Ellen Syracuse (Los Alamos National Lab)
icon-caret-right Volcanism from slab to surface: The iMUSH project | Geoff Abers (Cornell)
Discussion (Katie Kelley)

International opportunities and future planning (convener: Peter van Keken)

icon-caret-right VoiLA: Volatile recycling in the Lesser Antilles arc | Saskia Goes (Imperial)
icon-caret-right JAMSTEC Marine geophysical projects for researches on Subduction Cycles & DeformationShuichi Kodaira (JAMSTEC)
icon-caret-right The Tonga-Kermadec-New Zealand arc – Lau back-arc: Future directionsSimon Turner (Macquarie University)
Discussion

icon-caret-right SZO overview  | Terry Plank (Columbia U)
icon-caret-right SZO – Perspectives from the student & postdoc symposium | Erin Wirth (U of Washington)
Open mike
Discussion (Peter van Keken)
 icon-caret-right Introduction to Catalina Island field trip | Sarah Penniston-Dorland (Maryland)

A field trip (led by Sarah Penniston-Dorland) will be organized on Santa Catalina Island on Thursday October 15. This will give participants the opportunity to see amphibolite- and blueschist-facies rocks that have been exhumed from a paleosubduction zone. There is no NSF funding for this trip and participants will need to cover all expenses. We estimate that the cost (including transport from hotel to ferry terminal, ferry ride, transport on Catalina, breakfast and lunch; accommodation at the Portofino for one more night) is around $400-$500 per person. The departure time from the hotel (to catch the first ferry to the island) will be at 5:15am. Cost for participants who do not require an additional night of accommodation will be adjusted. Capacity for the field trip is limited and we will confirm participants on a first-come, first-served basis after receipt of payment.

Agenda (last update October 6)
Poster schedule (last update October 8)
Abstract volume (last update October 8)
Student symposium participant list (last update October 8)

RIE Implementation Workshop


 November 4-6, 2010
Santa Fe, New Mexico

 icon-download Download the Implementation Plan

AnnouncementAgenda - Presentation archiveStudent PresentationsWhite Papersmore infoOutcomes

A MARGINS/GeoPRISMS-sponsored workshop on the new GeoPRISMS Rift Initiation and Evolution (RIE) Initiative will be held November 4-6, 2010 in Santa Fe, New Mexico. This workshop will produce the implementation plan for the RIE component of the GeoPRISMS Science Plan. Participants will further refine the themes and the unanswered questions proposed in the RIE Initiative in the GeoPRISMS Draft Science Plan. We will also develop the science implementation plan. Two key goals of this workshop are to resolve which themes and questions require “Primary Sites” for concentrated, collaborative investigations, and to finalize selection of one or two such Sites. The RIE Initiative addresses four broad questions:

  1. Where and why do continental rifts initiate?
  2. How do fundamental rifting processes (such as tectonics, magmatism, and erosion, transport, and sedimentation), and the feedbacks between them, evolve in time and space?
  3. What controls the structural and stratigraphic architecture of rifted continental margins during and after breakup?
  4. What are the mechanisms and consequences of fluid and volatile exchange between the Earth, oceans, and atmosphere at rifted continental margins, and between the lithosphere and the mantle?

The workshop will consist of two days of presentations, poster-sessions and breakout group discussions, followed by a half-day discussion to finalize the implementation plan including decisions on Primary Sites. Workshop participants will focus on refining RIE science goals and establishing accomplishment milestones in order to answer the RIE research questions in a 5 and 10 year time period. Participants will also evaluate strategies to address these goals, including opportunities for collaboration with international and national research partners, sister organizations, and industry. On the afternoon of the third day, there will be an optional half-day field trip to various sites within the Rio Grande rift.
Interested researchers from all countries should submit an application online by August 1, 2010. The application should include a brief statement of interest and a short C.V. All scientists interested in rifted margin studies are encouraged to apply, independent of past involvement in MARGINS or GeoPRISMS. Post-docs, senior graduate students, and members of underrepresented groups are especially encouraged to participate. Selected participants will be notified by Sept. 1, 2010. Funding from NSF is expected to cover a significant fraction of travel and accommodation costs for U.S. participants. Questions or comments may now be directed to the GeoPRISMS Office: info (at) geoprisms.nineplanetsllc.com.

Workshop Conveners:

Mike Oskin – University of California, Davis (Chair)
Ramon Arrowsmith – Arizona State University
Peter Flemings – University of Texas, Austin
Donna Shillington – Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory
Jolante van Wijk – University of Houston

Day 1 | Wednesday, November 3

4-7:00 pm Loretto Hotel Lobby Registration in the Loretto Hotel lobby with cash bar. Collect your meeting folder and name tag here. Post day one posters.

7:00 pm Meeting organizers gather for dinner out.

Day 2 | Thursday, November 4

7:30 am Zuni Ballroom Coffee and Muffins (grad student orientation)

8:00 am Meeting welcome and logistics | Mike Oskin/organizing committee

8:10 am Summary of RIE Science Plan | Juli Morgan

8:20 am NSF & Other VIP comments

8:30 am Theme Session 1 – Initiation
how and why do continental rifts initiate? |   1Mb – Ramon Arrowsmith
Science Plan Review
Afar/Aden example |   10Mb Derek Keir

Woodlark basin example | Suzanne Baldwin

9:30 am break & posters

10:00 am Theme Session 2 – Evolution
How do fundamental rifting processes (such as tectonics, magmatism, and erosion, transport, and sedimentation), and the feedbacks between them, evolve in time and space? |   3Mb Donna Shillington
Science Plan Review
model perspective |   3MbLuc Lavier
observation perspective |   9MbGraham Kent

11:00 am Grad-student poster pop-ups

11:20 am Charge to Break-Out Groups (Mike Oskin)

11:30 am Break outs 1 & 2 (small groups discuss, each w/leader and scribe)

talk about this science topic. 4 groups, two sets of questions (theme 1 and theme 2). Issues to consider: a) What is the compelling science? b) What is achievable in 5 years? c) What is achievable in 10 years (GeoPRISMS nominal lifetime)? d) What are highest priorities for sequestered GeoPRISMS program funds? e) Which themes require Primary Sites for concentrated, collaborative investigations? f) What specific types of experiments or observations are needed at these sites? g) Provide a ppt summary slide of implementation strategy.

12:30 pm Lunch & posters

2:00 pm Theme Session 3 – Architecture
What controls the structural and stratigraphic architecture of rifted continental margins during and after breakup? |   1Mb Jolante van Wijk
Science Plan Review
stratigraphic architecture |   4MbWonsuck Kim

passive margin deformation |   6MbFrank Bilotti

3:00 pm break & posters

3:30 pm Theme Session 4 – Fluids
What are the mechanisms and consequences of fluid and volatile exchange between the Earth, oceans, and atmosphere at rifted continental margins, and between the lithosphere and the mantle? |   2Mb Peter Flemings
Science Plan Review
mantle / volcanism |   6Mb Tobias Fischer

crustal fluid systems |   17MbJoe Cartwright

4:30 pm Break outs 3 & 4

5:30 pm Break for dinner on your own– recommend that break-out group report writers eat together. Grad-student group dinner.

7:00-9:00 pm breakout group report preparation / grad-student poster judging

Day 3 | Friday, November 5

7:30 am Coffee and Muffins & poster trade-out (take down day 1, post day 2)

8:00 am Overview of schedule and goals of day | Mike Oskin

8:10 am Break-out 1A & 1B report & discussion (10 min presentation from each group, followed by 15 minute discussion of theme implementation strategy)

8:45 am Earthscope collaboration opportunities | Mousumi Roy

9:10 am Break-out 2A & 2B report & discussion

9:45 am Break

10:00 am USGS & IODP collaboration opportunities |   2MbCarolyn Ruppel

10:25 am Break-out 3A & 3B report & discussion

11:00 am industry collaboration opportunities | Lori Summa

11:25 am Break-out 4A & 4B report & discussion

12:00 pm Lunch (& grad student implementation report prep)

1:30 pm Implementation Strategies 1 (Short talks based on submitted white papers)

2:45 pm Break

3:00 pm Grad student-led presentation on implementation strategy

3:30 pm Implementation Strategies 2

4:45 pm Charge to break-out groups and discussion of site ranking procedure

5:00 pm Break-out group discussion: Formulate 1 or 2 straw implementation plans based on evaluation of sites, White Paper presentations

6:00 pm Meeting banquet, award for best grad-student poster & special presentation  | Karl Karlstrom & Laura Crossey

7:30 pm Poster Session & break-out group report preparation

Day 4 | Saturday, November 6

7:30 am – Coffee and Muffins

8:00 am Intro to structure of science plan writing and organization of day | Mike Oskin

8:15 am Group Discussion of Overall Implementation Plan (including reports of break-out groups from end of day 2)
a) What is the compelling science? b) What is achievable in 5 years? c) What is achievable in 10 years (GeoPRISMS nominal lifetime)? d) Which themes require Primary Sites for concentrated, collaborative investigations? e) What are highest priorities for sequestered GeoPRISMS program funds?

9:45 am Summarize viable implementation strategies for consideration.

10:00 am Break & non-binding secret ballot on implementation strategies

10:30 am Group Discussion of Primary Sites

11:30 am Decision on Primary Sites (by consensus or by ballot)

12:00 pm Meeting ends, optional half-day field trip

12:00 pm Lunch (writing team only)

1:00-5:00 pm Writing team meeting

 icon-download Download the compiled white papers

The Walker Lane Rift System: A Natural Laboratory to Study Rift Initiation that Culminated in Seafloor Spreading (in the Gulf of California) |  1Mb Cathy Busby et al.

The East African Rift System: A possible primary or thematic site |  6MbAtekwana et al., Ebinger, Gaherty et al., Reilinger et al., Rooney et al.

Oblique rifted margins: Lena trough as an archetype |  1Mb – Dick et al.

Submarine Landslides Rapid Response Opportunities |  1Mb Brandon Dugan et al.

Active Faulting and Magmatic Processes: Fundamental Constraints on Passive Margin Formation |  6Mb – Cindy Ebinger et al.

US Atlantic Continental Margin |  1Mb Gaherty et al., Hornbach et al., Olsen et al.

Continental Breakup and Formation of Rifted Margins: The Gulf of Mexico as a Natural Laboratory |  10Mb D. Harry et al.

Woodlark Rifting White Paper: Important processes and implementation |  25Mb Mann et al.

Final participant list (last update 09-24)

Conference venue: Loretto Hotel

Thank you to the meeting attendees for participating in the difficult process of reaching a consensus on the future direction of GeoPRISMS. The active engagement of a vibrant community is essential to the success of the program. Also, a special thanks to all of the speakers, break-out group leaders / co- leaders, and White Paper authors, without whom we could not have had such a meaningful debate on the direction of the RIE component of GeoPRISMS. Finally, we want to recognize the enthusiastic participation of the graduate students, which greatly influenced this process. For those that could not attend, the decision process on Primary Sites is as follows:

Active Margin: East Africa Rift system (onshore / lacustrine)
Passive Margin: North Atlantic (U.S., Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland)

There remains a number of important tasks ahead. The conveners and selected meeting participants will develop a draft of the implementation plan by January 5 for review by the community. This plan will be submitted to NSF by February 1 if not sooner. It is apparent from the size of the Primary Sites (each are 1000s of km in length), that additional planning workshops will be forthcoming to further focus community efforts and develop proposals for gathering of community data sets.

Workshop Conveners (in alphabetical order):

Mike Oskin – University of California, Davis (Chair)
Ramon Arrowsmith – Arizona State University
Peter Flemings – University of Texas, Austin
Donna Shillington – Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory
Jolante van Wijk – University of Houston

SCD Implementation Workshop


   January 5-7, 2011
Bastrop, Texas

 icon-download Download the Implementation Plan

AnnouncementAgenda - Presentation archiveBreak out presentationsWhite Papersmore infoOutcomes

Announcement

A MARGINS/GeoPRISMS-sponsored workshop on the new GeoPRISMS Subduction Cycles and Deformation (SCD) Initiative will be held January 5-7, 2011 in Austin, Texas. This workshop will produce the implementation plan for the SCD component of the GeoPRISMS Science Plan. Participants will further refine the themes and the unanswered questions proposed for the SCD Initiative in the GeoPRISMS Draft Science Plan. The SCD Initiative addresses these key topics:

  1. Controls on the size, frequency and slip behavior of subduction plate boundaries
  2. Spatial and temporal patterns of deformation through the seismic cycle
  3. Linkages between volatile release and the rheology of the plate boundary interface
  4. Storage, transfer, and release of volatiles through subduction systems
  5. Geochemical products of subduction and creation of continental crust
  6. Subduction zone initiation and arc system formation
  7. Feedbacks between surface processes and subduction zone dynamics

The workshop will narrow the focus of these seven themes, prioritize scientific objectives, and develop a 10-year implementation plan, including identification of potential collaborations with national and international research partners. An additional goal of this workshop is the selection of one or two “Primary Sites” for focused investigations and to define the desired balance between “Primary Sites” research versus other efforts.

Interested researchers should submit an application online by October 8, 2010. The application should include a brief statement of how the applicant expects to contribute to the workshop’s goals and a short C.V. All scientists interested in subduction-related studies are encouraged to apply, independent of past involvement in MARGINS or GeoPRISMS. Post-docs, senior graduate students, and members of underrepresented groups are especially encouraged to participate. Selected participants will be notified by November 12, 2010. Funding from NSF is expected to cover a significant fraction of travel and accommodation costs for U.S. participants. Questions or comments may be directed to the GeoPRISMS/MARGINS Office at info (at) geoprisms.nineplanetsllc.com.

Workshop Conveners:

Michael Underwood – University of Missouri-Columbia (co-Chair)
Clifford Thurber – University of Wisconsin-Madison (co-Chair)
Harm Van Avendonk – University of Texas, Austin
Susan Bilek – New Mexico Tech
Heather DeShon – University of Memphis
Michael Gurnis – Caltech
Demian Saffer – Penn State University

Day 1 | Wednesday, January 5

Phase 1. Sharpen the focus of the seven key topics

8:00 Introduction by conveners | Cliff Thurber, Mike Underwood

8:15 Briefings by GSOC Chair, NSF | Juli Morgan, Bil Haq

9:00 Plenary talks on the seven key topics (Moderators: Underwood and DeShon)
9:00 Key topic 1: Controls on the size, frequency and slip behavior of subduction plate boundaries |  9Mb – Thorne Lay

9:20 Key topic 2: Spatial and temporal patterns of deformation through the seismic cycle |  6Mb – Jeff Freymueller

9:40 Key topic 3: Linkages between volatile release and the rheology of the plate boundary interface |  icon-file 8Mb Greg Hirth

10:00 Coffee break

10:20 Key topic 4: Storage, transfer, and release of volatiles through subduction systems |  4Mb – Paul Wallace

10:40 Key topic 5: Geochemical products of subduction and creation of continental crust  |  6Mb – Maureen Feineman

11:00 Key topic 6: Subduction zone initiation and arc system formation |  9Mb Bob Stern

11:20 Key topic 7: Feedbacks between surface processes and subduction zone dynamics |  7Mb John Jaeger

11:40 Questions and answers; break-out instructions

12:00 Lunch

1:00 Break-out sessions

each on one of the 7 key topics – focus and refine the science; allow for session switching mid-way through

Break-out session leaders:
  1. Emily Brodsky and Chuck Ammon
  2. Kelin Wang and Heather Savage
  3. Ikuko Wada and Shun-ichiro Karato
  4. Doug Wiens and Kathy Cashman
  5. Rebecca Lange and Liz Cottrell
  6. Mark Reagan and Magali Billen
  7. Liz Hajek and Ken Ridgway

3:00 Coffee break

3:30 Talks by early-career speakers (3 talks, 20 min each; moderators Kelley and Van Avendonk)

Double-difference tomography applied to the Middle America and Sunda seismogenic zones |  14Mb – Heather DeShon
Persistent rupture segmentation along the Sunda megathrust off Sumatra |  10Mb – Aron Meltzner
Implications of deep transport of slab-adjacent hydrated material at subduction zones |  7Mb – Laura Hebert

4:30 Grad student and post-doc “pop-ups” & “poster advertisements”

5:15 Plenary session: reports on break-outs with open mic – prioritize key topics

6:45 dinner

7:45 Poster session (with cash bar)

Day 2 | Thursday, January 6

Phase 2. Initial consideration of prospective primary sites and implementation issues

8:00 Plenary talks by potential program partners (moderators Gurnis and DeShon)
8:00 Cascadia |  8MbJeff McGuire
8:15 EarthScope |  6MbAnne Trehu

8:30 IODP |  5MbMarta Torres

8:45 International Panel – potential collaborations and infrastructure
JAMSTEC |  8MbShuichi Kodaira
IFM-GEOMAR, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, University of Florence |  37Mb Heidrun Kopp, Lisa McNeill, Paola Vannucchi
GNS Science |  3Mb Laura Wallace

9:45 Conveners – break-out instructions (Underwood, Thurber)

10:00 Coffee break

10:15 Break-out session

for the key topic, discuss the need for primary sites versus more “cross-cutting” science, identify and prioritize potential primary sites, and define the desired balance between primary sites research versus other efforts; allow for session switching mid-way through.

12:15 Lunch

1:15 Talks by early-career speakers (3 talks, 20 min each; moderators Kelley and Thurber)
The 
global
 chlorine
 cycle: 
a 
subduction 
zone 
perspective |  2Mb – Jamie Barnes
Thermochemical evolution of the mantle wedge |  4MbPaul Hall
Melange zones and metasomatism in subduction zone metamorphic rocks |  7MbSarah Penniston-Dorland

2:15 Plenary session: reports on break-outs, with open mike – begin to narrow the options, merge/blend common interests, and prioritize the primary sites across key topics, implementation realities

3:15 Coffee Break

Phase 3. Pragmatic assessment of prospective primary sites

4:00 Conveners – breakout instructions (Underwood, Thurber)

4:15 Break-out sessions: to discuss details of the science plan, including site selection, specific categories of data acquisition, and partnerships – organize by sites plus thematic

5:15 Grad student and post-doc implementation plan presentation

5:45 Plenary session: reports on break-outs with open mike, narrow the options even more to a small number of viable/pragmatic candidate sites (moderators Van Avendonk and Gurnis)

6:45 Dinner

7:45 Poster session (with cash bar)

Day 3 | Friday, January 7

Phase 4. Implementation

8:00 Introduction by conveners – review of goals and deliverables (Underwood, Thurber)

8:15 Plenary session: discussion on sites and vote (if necessary) on site selection; break-out instructions (moderators Underwood and Thurber)

9:30 Break-out sessions: to refine/finalize immature sections of the draft science plan – organize by sites plus thematic

11:00 Plenary session: wrap-up, including consensus on 10-year timeline for implementation (moderators Underwood and Thurber)

Wednesday 1/5 PM — Reports on the main questions of the Draft Science Plan for SCD
Thursday 1/6 PM (1) — Key topic, primary site, and thematic study discussion

 icon-download Download the compiled white papers

Illuminating the Architecture of Crustal Magmatic Systems in the Cascade Region |  300Kb – Olivier Bachmann et al.

Deformation Measurements across an entire Subduction Plate Boundary: Cascadia Subduction Zone |  300Kb – C. David. Chadwell et al.

Four-D Investigation of Subduction Initiation (SI) Magmatism as Revealed in Tethyan Forearc Ophiolites |  300Kb – Yildirim Dilek et al.

Tracking Volatiles at Mount St. Helens from Magma Chamber Residence to Eruption at the Vent |  3Mb – Kimberly Genareau et al.

Computational Geodynamics as a Core Component of a Broad-Based Subduction Initiation Research Program |  3MbMichael Gurnis et al.

The New Zealand Region: A key natural laboratory for studying subduction initiation |  4MbMichael Gurnis et al.

The Aleutian Island Arc near Adak as a GeoPRISMS Focus Site: Finally, a Subduction Factory that actually makes continental crust? |  800KbW. Steven Holbrook et al.

The Leading Edge of the Mantle Wedge: Structural and metamorphic studies of peridotite thrust over metasediments & basalts |  100Kb Peter Kelemen et al.

Comparing Coeval Plutonic and Volcanic Rocks in the Aleutian Arc: Are primitive, mafic lavas representative of arc fluxes? |  200Kb – Peter Kelemen et al.

Exhumed Subduction Margins: An important record of deformation and metamorphic processes |  100Kb – Mary Leech

Seismic Hazards, Continental Deformation, and Mantle Recycling Associated with the Himalayan Continental Subduction Zone |  200KbJames Ni et al.

Metamorphic Processes Implementation Strategy – GeoPRISMS SCD |  3Mb – Sarah Penniston-Dorland et al.

Subduction Initiation and the Need to Study Forearc Crust |  600KbMark K. Reagan et al.

Africa-Arabia-Eurasia Plate Interactions and Implications for the Dynamics of Mediterranean Subduction and Red Sea Rifting |  600Kb – Robert Reilinger et al.

The SW North American Cordillera: an exposed, accessible and underutilized archive of Paleozoic to Cenozoic subduction-initiation processes |  10Mb J. Saleeby et al.

An Implementation Strategy for Understanding Subduction Initiation (SI); Integrated Studies of Naked Forearcs, Ophiolites, and Geodynamic Modeling |  500Kb – Robert J. Stern et al.

The Southeast Mariana Forearc Rift: A Modern Analogue for Forearc Extension during Subduction Initiation |  400KbRobert J. Stern et al.

The Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand: an important natural laboratory to understand subduction thrust behavior |  700Kb  Laura Wallace et al.

The Gulf of Alaska Margin: Potential Focus Site for GeoPRISMS SCD |  200KbLindsay L. Worthington et al.

Helpful Links

Final participant list (last update 01-03)

Conference venue: Lost Pines Resort

Meeting participants

We are pleased to report on the outcome of the most recent GeoPRISMS planning meeting, the Subduction Cycles and Deformation (SCD) Implementation Workshop, held in Bastrop, TX this past week. Approximately 135 people were in attendance, over a 2.5-day period. Substantial discussion took place both in break-outs and in plenary session, leading to a decisive vote selecting three primary sites for future GeoPRISMS SCD investigations, listed in order of preference: Alaska (including the mainland and Aleutian extension), Cascadia, and New Zealand. Several thematic study topics were also outlined, and will be made available on the GeoPRISMS website in the near future.

Alaska was selected as the highest priority site, as it offers real opportunities to address a wide variety of questions outlined within the SCD science plan. However, it was recognized that GeoPRISMS investigations there will require significant ramp-up time, and strong integration with EarthScope activities that are still in the planning stages.

Cascadia offers outstanding immediate-term opportunities, with the ongoing deployment of the amphibious array as part of the Cascadia Initiative, and the coalescence of a range of US, Canadian, and international scientists for coordinated onshore and offshore investigations.

New Zealand elicited significant excitement, in part due to major national investments both on- and off-shore by their national government, and growing international collaborations in that setting. New Zealand also exhibits a wide range of fault slip and volcanic processes with significant along-strike variations in a compact setting, as well as excellent exhumed exposures of arc crust, all integral to the major SCD questions. In addition, GeoPRISMS investigators in New Zealand can leverage previous MARGINS research from the Source-to-Sink efforts along the northern Hikurangi margin. An IODP proposal is also in the pipeline.

The logistics and timeframes for studying each of the three primary sites will be different, and such details will be outlined within the Implementation Plan arising from the meeting.

We would like to thank the meeting attendees for their participation in the process of reaching consensus on the future direction of the SCD initiative. Also, a special thanks to all of the speakers, break-out group leaders, and White Paper authors for their contributions in making the workshop such a success. Finally, we want to recognize the enthusiastic participation of the graduate students and post-docs for their input.

A number of important tasks lie ahead. The conveners and break-out leaders will develop a draft of the implementation plan by January 29 for review by the community. This plan will be submitted to NSF by early February. The primary sites will require additional planning workshops to further focus community efforts and develop proposals for gathering of community data sets, etc.

Workshop Conveners (in alphabetical order):

Susan Bilek – New Mexico Tech
Heather DeShon – Memphis University
Mike Gurnis – California Institute of Technology
Katie Kelley – University of Rhode Island
Demian Saffer – Pennsylvania State University
Cliff Thurber – University of Wisconsin (SCD Implementation Co-Chair )
Mike Underwood – University of Missouri (SCD Implementation Co-Chair )
Harm van Avendonk – University of Texas, Austin
Julia Morgan – Rice University (Chair, GeoPRISMS Steering and Oversight Committee)

2011 Planning Workshop for the Alaska Primary Site


  icon-map-marker September 22-24, 2011
Portland, Oregon

 icon-download Download the Implementation Plan

AnnouncementAgenda - Presentation archiveStudent SymposiumWhite Papersmore infoOutcomes

The GeoPRISMS Steering and Oversight Committee is pleased to announce a workshop to develop a detailed science plan for the GeoPRISMS Alaska Primary Site. Alaska was chosen as the highest priority primary site for GeoPRISMS because it offers broad opportunities to address a wide variety of questions outlined within the Subduction Cycles and Deformation (SCD) Science Plan. More details about GeoPRISMS science objectives in Alaska can be found in the GeoPRISMS Science Plans and will serve as the starting points for this workshop.

The main goals of the workshop are to clarify common research objectives in Alaska with both USArray and the Plate Boundary Observatory, to discuss the concept of “Discovery Corridors” and identify candidate areas, and to outline detailed implementation plans and timelines for GeoPRISMS research, considering available resources and infrastructure. White papers will be solicited in advance of the workshop to ensure community input.

Researchers from all countries are encouraged to apply, independent of past involvement in MARGINS. Post-docs, senior graduate students, and members of under-represented groups are especially encouraged to participate. Funding from NSF is expected to cover a significant fraction of travel and accommodation costs for ~75 participants with a diversity of interests. Applications should include a brief statement of interest and anticipated contribution to the workshop and a short C.V.

The program will include a number of overview presentations on Alaska and related MARGINS, GeoPRISMS, and EarthScope research programs, break-out sessions, and plenary discussions, leading to conclusive decisions about science implementation in Alaska.

Workshop Conveners:

Jeff Freymueller – University of Alaska-Fairbanks
Peter Haeussler – USGS, Anchorage
John Jaeger – University of Florida
Donna Shillington – Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Cliff Thurber – University of Wisconsin-Madison
Gene Yogodzinski – University of South Carolina
Jeff Marshall – Cal Poly Pomona, Student Coordinator and Symposium Convener

Student Symposium | Wednesday, September 21

6:30 Workshop registration, Ice Breaker, set up regular poster session

Day 1 | Thursday, September 22

Moderators: Cliff Thurber and John Jaeger
7:00 Breakfast at World Trade Center
8:00 Welcome from the conveners, logistics
8:15 Comments from NSF representatives | Bilal Haq & Chuck Estabrook 

8:30 Alaska margin geology and tectonic history
The Alaska convergent margin: 200 million years of subduction/strike-slip tectonics |  6Mb – Terry Pavlis

The basic rock and sedimentary architecture of the submerged Alaska and Aleutian Forearcs – first order observations, questions, and wonderments |  5Mb – Dave Scholl

9:10 Surface processes and tectonics
Mechanics, structure, and evolution of forearcs: the Aleutian margin as seen from a global perspective |  3Mb – Don Fischer

Influence of surface processes and sediment flux on subduction cycles and dynamics |  6MbSean Gulick

9:50 Coffee break

10:10 Megathrust behavior and the spectrum of seismic slip
Global comparison of slow slip behaviors: how does Alaska margin measure up? |  2Mb Susan Schwartz

Contemporary deformation in south-central Alaska |  3Mb – Tabrez Ali

10:50 Magma processes from deep to shallow
Insights from the Aleutians on continental genesis and evolution |  3MbPeter Kelemen

Tracking magma ascent in the Aleutian arc |  2MbStephanie Prejean

11:30 Mantle processes and geodynamics
Dynamic processes in the cold and hot regions of the mantle wedge |  2Mb Ikuko Wada

3D flow in subduction zones: implications for slab temperature and seismic anisotropy |  5MbPeter van Keken

12:15 Lunch

Moderators: Donna Shillington and Peter Haeussler
1:15 Topical talks
Effects of spatial and temporal variation in sediment flux on the Aleutian subduction zone |  6Mb – Bobby Reece
Heat flow measurements and the thermal state of the Alaska convergent margin |  2Mb – Rob Harris

3D geodynamic and geomorphic modelling of the Alaska/Aleutian margin – STEEP and GeoPRISMS |  1MbPhaedra Upton
Linking arc volcanic fluxes and growth rates with Pleistocene climate change: marine tephrostratigraphy of the Aleutian-Alaska volcanic arc | Susanne Straub

Seismic structure of the Aleutian island arc near Adak: finally, a Subduction Factory that actually makes continental crust? |  3Mb Steve Holbrook

2:30 Introduction to break-out process and objectives, including “Discovery Corridor” concept and thematic approach

2:45 Introduction for break-out #1: Research targets and data gaps

Instructions: Identify key onshore and offshore Alaska research targets and data gaps. Work toward convergence on question of Discovery Corridor locations, keeping in mind that some research objectives best-suited to thematic approach.

3:00 Coffee break

3:15 Break-out session #1, Round 1: Research targets and data gaps

Topics:
1. Controls on size, frequency, and slip behavior of subduction plate boundaries
Co-leaders: Rob Witter, Ray Wells

Scribe: Harmony Colella

2. Spatial ad temporal patterns of deformation through the seismic cycle
Co-leaders: Kelin Wang, Julie Elliott

Scribe: Lindsay Worthington

3. Storage, transfer, and release of volatiles through subduction systems
Co-leaders: Katie Kelley, Richard Allen

Scribe: Christie Till

4. Geochemical products of subduction and creation of continental crust
Co-leader: Steve Holbrook, Michele Coombs

Scribe: Ashley Tibbits

5. Subduction zone initiation and arc system formation
Co-leaders: Gail Christeson, Brad Singer

Scribe: Margarete Jadamec

6. Feedbacks between surface processes and subduction zone dynamics
Co-leader: Steve Kuelh, James Spotilla

Scribe: Bobby Reece

4:00 Break-out session 1, Round 2: Research Targets and Data Gaps (participants are required to change rooms)

4:45 Introduction to Alaska databases
GeoPRISMS Data Portal and MGDS |  1MbAndrew Goodwillie

Geochemical Databases |  1Mb Chris Nye

coffee break

5:15 Panel discussion logistical considerations for working in Alaska (3×5 min)
Marine Geophysical logistics |  3MbDonna Shillington
Onshore Field Geology |  13MbBrad Singer & Chris Nye

Onshore geophysical studies |  13MbJohn Power & Geoff Abers

6:00 Plenary – open mic discussion

6:30 Conference dinner (at World Trade Center)

7:30 Poster session (with cash bar); data mini-session (concurrent with posters)

Day 2 | Friday, September 23

7:00 Breakfast at World Trade Center

Moderators: Gene Yogodzinski and Jeff Freymueller

8:00 Break-out session 1 reports

9:30 Potential partners with GeoPRISMS (Panel)
Panelists provide 2-3 min introductions about representative partner activities, and their relevance to, and opportunities for, GeoPRISMS efforts
USGS/AVO |  2MbJohn Power
USGS, Int. Volcano Hazards Collaboration |  1MbJohn Eichelberger
USGS, Extended Continental Shelf |  1Mb Ginger Barth
Cascadia Initiative | Richard Allen
IRIS/USArray | Bob Woodward
Canada |  1Mb Kelin Wang
Germany and Russia |  1MbChristel van den Bogaard

Japan |  1Mb Yoahi Tatsumi

10:15 Coffee break

10:30 Introduction to break-out session 2: Implementation Strategies

Consider Discovery Corridors for focused research versus a thematic approach. Define overlaps and opportunities between GeoPRISMS & EarthScope activities. Begin to identify potential Discovery Corridors. Discuss possible thematic studies necesssary to complete primary site studies.

10:45 Break out session 2, Round 1: Implementation Strategies

Topics: (break-out leaders and scribes as for session 1)
1- Controls on size, frequency, and slip behavior of subduction plate boundaries
2- Spatial and temporal patterns of deformation through the seismic cycle
3- Storage, transfer, and release of volatiles through subduction systems
4- Geochemical products of subduction and creation of continental crust
5- Subduction zone initiation and arc system formation

6- Feedbacks between surface processes and subduction zone dynamics

11: 30 Break-out session 2, round 2: Implementation Strategies (Participants are required to switch rooms)

12:15 Lunch

Moderators: Donna Shillington and Peter Haeussler

1:30 Break-out session 2 reports

2:30 Plenary – open mic discussion of Implementation Strategies

3:15 Coffee Break

3:45 Introduction to break-out session 3: Discovery Corridors and Themes

Refine potential Discovery Corridor locations across discipline, and resolve implementation gaps that justify thematic studies.

 4:00 Break out session 3: Discovery Corridors and Themes

5:15 Plenary open-mic discussion of Discovery Corridors and Themes

6:00 Dinner on your own (plus sponsored student dinner)

7:30 Poster session (with cash bar)

Day 3 | Saturday, September 24

7:00 Breakfast at World Trade Center

Moderators: Cliff Thurber and John Jaeger

8:00 Break out session 3 reports

9:00 Plenary open-mic discussion with final vote on Discovery Corridors and Themes

10:00 Introduction to break out session 4: data acquisition plans

A) Outline and justify future data acquisition efforts, identify possible community experiments, sequence, and timelines and (B) thematic efforts, especially those not fully addressed by Discovery Corridors

10:15 Coffee break

10:30 Break out session 4: Data Acquisition Plans

11:30 Plenary discussion, student perspective, decision making, and wrap-up

GeoPRISMS Student Symposium for the Alaska Primary Site

  Portland, OR
Wednesday, September 21, 2011

A Graduate Student Symposium and Field Trip will be held on September 21, 2011, in Portland, Oregon, in association with the GeoPRISMS Alaska Primary Site Planning Workshop. All graduate students are encouraged to participate in this pre-workshop program, which is designed to (1) introduce students to the objectives and opportunities of the GeoPRISMS Program, (2) provide scientific background about the Alaska Primary Site, (3) enable brief student presentations, as well as discussion and interaction in a comfortable setting, and (4) visit relevant geologic field sites in the Portland area. All symposium participants will enter the workshop with a rich background in the workshop topics and objectives, a strong cohort of colleagues, and a greater voice in decision-making that will take place during the workshop.

7:30 Breakfast and introduction

8:00 Welcome and symposium objectives | Jeff Marshall & organizers
8:10 Introdution to GeoPRISMS | Juli Morgan
8:30 Alaskan tectonics/structural framework | Peter Haeussler
9:00 Alaskan volcanism | Gene Yogodzinski

9:30 Alaskan surface processes & feedbacks | John Jaeger

10:00 Break

10:30 Student poster session

12:00 Pick-up box lunch, get on bus for field trip; introduction to field trip on bus

1:00 Field trip (Boring Volcanics/Columbia River Gorge)

6:30 Workshop registration, Ice Breaker, set up regular poster session

 icon-download Download the compiled white papers

Deploy the Amphibious Array to the Alaska-Aleutian Subduction System |  3Mb – Geoff Abers et al.

Collection of Potential Fields Data to Constrain Spatial Patterns of Deformation in South-Central, Alaska |  2Mb – Diane Doser et al.

The influence of the Yakutat microplate on the Alaska subduction zone |  2Mb – Julie Elliott et al.

The Case for Considering the Entire Aleutian System |  400Kb – John Eichelberger et al.

Understanding Alaska Tsunamis generated by Slope Failure |  2MbGerard Fryer et al.

GeoPRISMS Data Portal |  1MbAndrew Goodwillie et al.

Discovery Corridors, Islands, and Megathrust Earthquake Ruptures (a.k.a. The Megathrust Megaswath) |  2Mb Peter Haeussler et al.

Glacial-Marine Sedimentation: an important dimension of the Alaska/Aleutian Margin |  300Kb – Bernard Hallet & Charles Nittrouer

Seismic structure of the Aleutian island arc near Adak: Finally, a Subduction Factory that actually makes continental crust? |  2Mb Steve Holbrook et al.

3D Numerical Modeling of the Alaska and Central America Subduction Zones: Implications for Plate-Mantle Decoupling |  2MbM. Jadamec et al.

The Timing of Aleutian Arc Inception and Nascent Magmatic Evolution: Current Status and Future Prospects|  1MbBrian Jicha et al.

Impact of the Lithological Input into the Alaska/Aleutian Subduction Zone on Hydrology and Physical State of the Subducting Zone |  100Kb Miriam Kastner et al.

Proposed studies of plutons in the oceanic Aleutian arc: Building blocks for continental crust via arc magmatism |  500KbPeter Kelemen et al.

Variations in Seismicity Along the Central Aleutian Arc: An Opportune Site for GeoPRISMS Research |  400KbKatie Keranen et al.

The Importance of the Land-Based Paleoseismic Record of Giant Subduction Earthquakes Under Southern Alaska as Possible Reference Markers in the Trench Turbidite Record West of Kodiak Island |  100Kb – Stephen Kirby & George Plafker

Off-trench Earthquakes in Alaska and Their Tectonic Significance |  1MbStephen Kirby et al.

Coastal Paleoseismology and Paleotsunami Studies in the Eastern Aleutians: A Focus Region for the GeoPRISMS Subduction Cycles and Deformation Plan |  300Kb Alan Nelson et al.

GeoPRISMS Planning Workshop for the Alaska Primary Site White Paper: An Aleutian Seismological Observatory |  200Kb Stephanie Prejean et al.

Effects of spatial and temporal variation in sediment flux on the Aleutian subduction zone |  300KbBobby Reece et al.

From the Slab to the Surface: Origin, Storage, Ascent and Eruption of Volatile-Bearing Magmas |  500KbDiana Roman et al.

The Aleutian‐Alaska Subduction Zone Is Prone to Rupture in Great and Giant Megathrust Earthquakes — How Scientific Information Can Mitigate Consequences |  900Kb David Scholl et al.

Heat flow measurements and the thermal state of the Alaska convergent margin |  1MbGlenn Spinelli and Robert Harris

Linking arc volcanic fluxes and growth rates with Pleistocene climate change: Marine tephrostratigraphy of the Aleutian‐Alaska volcanic arc |  700KbSuzanne Straub and Gisela Winckler

FlexArray Alaska: Basin-to-slab seismic imaging of subduction tectonics |  3MbCarl Tape et al.

3D geodynamic and geomorphic modelling of the Alaska/Aleutian Margin – STEEP and GeoPRISMS |  400KbPhaedra Upton et al.

Toward a Synoptic View of Alaska-Aleutian Volcanic Rock Geochemistry: The Rationale for a Campaign of Isotope Data Acquisition on Existing Samples |  500Kb Gene Yogodzinski et al.

Call for White Papers

Scientists interested in participating in the development of the implementation plan for Alaska as one of the NSF GeoPRISMS program’s Primary Sites are invited to submit White Papers to the GeoPRISMS Office in advance of the Alaska Primary Site Planning Workshop. White Papers should propose specific science objectives and show suitability for addressing the research themes outlined in the GeoPRISMS Draft Science Plan, specifically the Alaska Primary Site Implementation Plan. Example White Paper topics could include geographic targets or regions relevant to the selection of “Discovery Corridors,” or implementation strategies for carrying out thematic studies deemed necessary to complete primary site studies. To be most effective, White Papers should make an explicit case for how they address one of more of the key SCD questions.

White Papers will be made available to meeting participants and the community prior to the workshop, and will be used in the implementation strategy decision-making process during the workshop.

Guidelines

White Papers submitted by proponent teams are preferred to ensure broader consensus, although individuals are also welcome to submit.

Authors can contribute more than one white paper.

White Papers should be clear and succinct and are limited to 2 pages of text plus 1 page of figures and references.

The conveners reserve the right to restrict dissemination of papers deemed to be too narrow in scope or not aimed at the implementation plan.

Please provide the following header information on each paper (see Word Template):

White Paper Title
Authors and Affiliations
Contact information
Proposed sites and/or themes addressed
Key types of existing or forthcoming data/infrastructure to build upon

Final participant list (last update 09-12-11)

Workshop hotel: Hotel 50, 50 Southwest Morrison Street Portland, OR 97204-3390
Workshop meeting venue: Portland World Trade Center, 121 SW Salmon St, 2WTC, Portland OR 97204

GeoPRISMS-EarthScope Alaska Planning Workshop group photo.

We are pleased to report on the outcome of the most recent GeoPRISMS planning meeting, the GeoPRISMS-EarthScope Planning Workshop for the Alaska Primary Site, held over a 2.5-day period in Portland, OR this past week. Approximately 150 people were in attendance. Substantial discussion took place both in break-outs and in plenary session, leading to a consensus plan for GeoPRISMS science in Alaska.

The primary elements of the science implementation plan are a geophysical transect along the oceanic part of the arc in combination with complementary focused studies of the Alaska Peninsula and Cook Inlet areas.

The geophysical transect along the oceanic arc is envisioned as the “back-bone” which provides a framework for focused studies at point locations encompassing varied aspects of the arc, fore-arc, trench and incoming plate. The chief focal point on the transect is the Amlia Fracture Zone area, where a strong contrast in trench sediment thickness and subducting plate age are linked to distinctive magma chemistry in the arc. This location may also mark a change in seismogenic character. Additional focal points in the Adak and Unalaska areas provide unique opportunities to characterize the birth and evolution of the arc, through geochemical and geochronological studies of plutonic and volcanic rocks produced early in the arc’s history. Volcanoes of the Unalaska area (e.g., Okmok, Akutan, Shishaldin) also provide ideal targets, located on the backbone transect, for slab-to-surface geophysical imaging of the largest and most active volcanic centers in the Alaska-Aleutian subduction system.

The Alaska Peninsula features dramatic along-strike changes in the seismogenic zone, spanning megathrust rupture areas in different parts of their cycles, and is the best location for combining onshore and offshore studies to investigate the causes of these changes. This area allows for focused investigation of segments characterized by creep, segments characterized by wide locked regions, and the boundaries between them. It offers the best opportunity to examine links between seismicity and forearc surface process and variable subduction inputs (e.g., fan sediment, seamounts, Aja Fracture zone). The Alaska Peninsula includes the most productive volcanoes of the continental part of the arc, including both large dominantly basaltic centers and smaller dominantly andesitic centers.

The Cook Inlet area is the continental end-member of the subduction zone, which experienced a watershed megathrust event in 1964, and is dominated in the Quaternary by glacial and other surface processes that direct sediment into the subduction zone and forearc. The clearest evidence in Alaska for large slow slip events and transient changes in the extent of the seismogenic zone come from this region. Cook Inlet and the Alaska Peninsula are also areas with substantial opportunities for synergy with EarthScope and the Alaskan Volcano Observatory, which maintains active monitoring of volcanoes in these regions.

Alaska was chosen as GeoPRISMS Primary Site because of the distinct along-arc changes in volcanism, seismicity, forearc structure, and subducting sediment thickness. Participants recognized that specific synoptic studies that address these spatial changes along the entire arc as opposed to specific target areas were needed. These studies could include geodesy, paleoseismology, surface processes and along-arc sediment transfer, arc geochemistry and geochronology, and passive seismic monitoring.

We would like to thank the meeting attendees for their participation in the process of reaching a consensus on the GeoPRISMS science plan for Alaska. Also, a special thanks to all of the speakers, break-out group leaders, and white paper authors for their contributions in making the workshop such a success. Finally, we want to recognize the enthusiastic participation of the graduate students and post-docs – their input is greatly appreciated.

A number of important tasks lie ahead. The conveners and break-out leaders plan to prepare a comprehensive workshop report for distribution by November 2011, and an updated draft of the GeoPRISMS Alaska science implementation plan by January 2012. The implementation plan will be made available for public comment prior to final release. It will serve as a guide for proposals submitted for the next NSF GeoPRISMS solicitation, July 1, 2012.

Workshop Conveners (in alphabetical order):

Jeff Freymueller – University of Alaska-Fairbanks
Peter Haeussler – USGS, Anchorage
John Jaeger – University of Florida
Donna Shillington – Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Cliff Thurber – University of Wisconsin-Madison
Gene Yogodzinski – University of South Carolina
Jeff Marshall – Cal Poly Pomona, Student Coordinator and Symposium Convener

 icon-chevron-right Photos from the workshop

2011 Planning Workshop for the ENAM Primary Site

October 27-29, 2011
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

AnnouncementAgenda - Presentation archiveStudent SymposiumWhite Papersmore infoOutcomes

We are pleased to announce a joint workshop aimed at assembling the EarthScope and GeoPRISMS communities interested in the formative onshore and offshore geological, geophysical, and geodynamic processes of Eastern North America (ENAM). Our goal is to focus community effort and research approaches on crucial science targets with a national and international forum of scientists from universities, national labs, industry, federal, and state agencies. The transportable array of EarthScope arrives in the mid-Atlantic region in 2012-13 and GeoPRISMS recently selected ENAM as a primary site for Rift Initiation and Evolution (RIE) study.

The workshop will take as its starting point the ENAM RIE portion of the GeoPRISMS Science and Implementation Plans and the Earthscope Science Plan. The goals of the workshop will be to clarify common research objectives on the Grenville and Appalachian foundation, the structural, magmatic, and geodynamic setting of rift initiation, the rift-to-drift record preserved in sedimentary archives, the processes that characterize the evolution to a mature passive margin, and the active lithospheric and surficial processes that characterize the modern margin with an emphasis on possible feedbacks between surface and deep-Earth processes.

We anticipate funding to support ~75 researchers with a diversity of interests to participate in this workshop, both from the US and abroad, independent of past involvement in MARGINS, GeoPRISMS, or EarthScope research efforts. Post-docs, senior graduate students, and members of underrepresented groups are especially encouraged to apply. Applications should include a brief statement of interest and anticipated contribution to the workshop, and a short (1 to 2 page) CV.

The workshop will be held at the new STEPS facility at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, PA. The program will include a number of overview presentations of eastern North American geology, geophysics, and geodynamics, updates on current GeoPRISMS and Earthscope research projects, break-out sessions, and plenary discussions leading to conclusive decisions on collaborative science targets and research corridors.

Workshop Conveners:

Frank J. Pazzaglia, Lehigh University
Peter Flemings, University of Texas at Austin
Vadim Levin, Rutgers University
Dan Lizarralde, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute
Basil Tikoff, University of Wisconsin
Martha Withjack, Rutgers University
Maggie Benoit, The College of New Jersey – Student Coordinator and Symposium Convener

Student Symposium | Wednesday, October 26

Day 1 | Thursday, October 27

7:00 Breakfast and registration.

Moderators: Frank Pazzaglia and Vadim Levin
8:00 Welcome, introductions and workshop goals | Frank Pazzaglia
8:15 NSF Program Director comments | C. Estabrook and Bil Haq
8:45 Review of EarthScope and GeoPRISMS science and implementation strategies and key decisions that must be made by each program
GeoPRISMS, research corridors, leveraging effort with industry and USGS, integration with EarthScope efforts |  3Mb – Juli Morgan

EarthScope, foundation of the 2004 workshop, key ENAM research topics, fate of TA and FA instruments and the possibility of an east coast observatory, extension of PBO to the east coast, integration with GeoPRISMS efforts |  3Mb – B. Tikoff

9:30 Plenary talks to introduce the ENAM region Session I
Modification of continental crust and lithosphere by continental rifting/breakup and by terrane accretion |  4Mb W. Thomas
Rifting and drifting in Eastern North America |  5Mb P. Olsen

Insights into rifting processes from variations in magmatism and structure along eastern North America |  9Mb D. Shillington

10:30 Working break, questions and discussion

11:00 Plenary talks to introduce the ENAM region session II
The lithosphere of the Appalachian orogen and the Atlantic passive margin: A seismological perspective |  2Mb K. Fischer
Analogue and numerical models that inform the rifting process  |  2MbJ. Armitage

Forward modeling of rift and passive margin formation; implications for South and Central Atlantic rifted margins | R. Huismans

12:00 Recent relevant EarthScope and GeoPRISMS projects
Southeastern suture of the Appalachian Mountain experiment (SESAME) project – broadband seismic experiment to study continental accretion and rifting |  6Mb L. Wagner

The Salton Seismic Project (SSIP): A joint GeoPRISMS + EarthScope + USGS investigation of Rift Initiation and Evolution |  5MbJ. Hole

12:40 Lunch

Moderators: Martha Withjack and Peter Flemings
1:30 Emerging hot topics (all of these are inter-related and important cross-program synergy building activities)
Late Cenozoic fluvial incision through the Susquehanna River drainage basin: A response to dynamic topography | S. Miller
Mantle dynamics and the recent evolution of the Eastern North American margin |  2Mb R. Moucha
EarthScope seismology |  3Mb M. Benoit

GeoPRISMS seismology |  3MbJ. Gaherty

2:10 Working break, questions and discussions. Includes an introduction to break-out process and objectives.

2:45 Breakout session I. Topical breakouts – introduction to key research ideas, participants are asked to rotate among two or more.
a. Orogenic processes – building the ENAM framework
b. Rifting processes – magmatism and the opening of the Atlantic Ocean
c. Post-rift processes – transformation to a passive margin

d. Neotectonics and surface processes – active processes on the passive margin

4:00 Emerging hot topics (all of these have important broader impacts)

Active deformation in Eastern North America |  3Mb M. Pritchard

Offshore active processes and hazards |  5MbP. Flemings

Diachronous evolution of syn-rift deformation and onset of seafloor spreading in the central Atlantic: Application of inverse continuum-based plate reconstruction methods |  7MbE. Kneller

Cenozoic history written in a passive continental margin: it’s there for the reading |  4Mb G. Mountain

5:00 Working break, questions and discussions

5:30 Breakout session II. Focus areas (e.g. Discovery Corridors) of the science topics; indentification of GeoPRISMS and EarthScope overlap

a. Orogenic processes – building the ENAM framework

b. Rifting processes – magmatism and the opening of the Atlantic Ocean

c. Post-rift processes – transformation to a passive margin

d. Neotectonics and surface processes – active processes on the passive margin

6:45 Board bus in for transport to the mountain-top campus

7:00 Dinner – Dinner presentation by Bob Sheridan on historic integrated approach to ENAM rifting and passive margin evolution

Moderator: Maggie Benoit

8:30 ENAM datasets and broad undergraduate involvement

GeoPRISMS and MARGINS data portal | A. Goodwillie

Potential for an ENAM REU |  3MbE. Johnson

9:30 Board bus for transport back to STEPS

Day 2 | Friday, October 28

7:00 Breakfast

Moderators: Dan Lizzarralde and Peter Flemings
8:00 Report from breakout sessions I and II and open discussion
9:30 Short presentation
Mineral, Virginia, earthquake illustrates seismicity of a passive-aggressive margin |  2MbS. Stein
Geodynamic modeling of the Canadian Margin | S. Ings
Other presentations

10:30 Working break and open discussion

11:00 Reports from aligned facilities and international partners
USGS: USGS work along the Atlantic Margin |  3MbD. Brothers
Implications of RIE basic science and models for an understanding of source and reservoir rocks on passive margin |  500KbG. Karner
Exploring pre-Cretaceous terranes and basins beneath the Atlantic Coastal Plain: Implications for rift-initiation and evolution |  2Mb W. Horton
New geoscience programs and initiatives for offshore Nova Scotia | D. Brown
European perspective on rifted margins | R. Huismans
Magma starved rifting: Galicia/Newfoundland breakup and initiation of  seafloor spreading |  1MbD. Sawyer

12:30 Questions and discussion

1:00 Lunch

Moderators: Basil Tikoff and Lori Summa
2:00 Breakout session I. Focus areas, discovery corridors, and synergy
Specific topics to be defined by the group discussion, possible including ES-GP synergy, fate of the TA in ENAM, and a possible PBO in ENAM. Rooms TBD.

6:30 Dinner

8:00 Poster session (Posters are up the entire meeting)

Day 3 | Saturday, October 29

All workshop participants are invited to attend a half-day field trip to examine Newark Rift Basin and its stratigraphy, sedimentology, and structure. The field trip will begin shortly following the close of the workshop.

Moderators: Frank Pazzaglia and Juli Morgan
8:00 Breakout session reports and open discussion

9:30 Student reports and perspectives

10:00 Break

10:30 Broader impacts

Panel discussion
EarthScope |  1Mb R. Arrowsmith and M. Fouch
GeoPRISMS |  1Mb J. Morgan and M. Benoit
DaVinci Science Center | D. Smith
IRIS |  4MbB. Woodward
R/V M.G. Langseth Facility |  4MbS.Higgins

11:00 Decision making

1. Where are the GeoPRISMS focus areas?
2. Where/how does GeoPRISMS leverage their efforts (industry and USGS)?
3. Are there GeoPRISMS thematic studies to be performed?
4. What are the highest priority EarthScope science targets?
5. What is the fate of the TA and FA once the scheduled deployment ends in 2015?
6. What would be the goals of an ENAM PBO?
7. What emerges as the best oppportunity for GeoPRISMS-EarthScope synergy?

12:30 Lunch (box lunch provided for field trip participants) and closure

1:30 Field trip to the Newark Basin exposures along the Delaware River

GeoPRISMS Student Symposium for the New Zealand Primary Site

  Cotton Building Room 217, Victoria University, Wellington, NZ
Sunday, April 14, 2013

The Graduate Student Symposium and Field Trip are designed to (1) introduce students to the objectives and opportunities of the EarthScope and GeoPRISMS Programs, (2) provide geologic and geophysical background about Eastern North America, both onshore and off (3) enable brief student presentations, as well as discussion and interaction in a comfortable setting, and (4) visit relevant geologic field sites in Pennsylvania. All symposium participants will enter the ENAM workshop with a rich background in the workshop topics and objectives, and an understanding of implementation strategies for moving the research horizon forward, as well as a strong cohort of colleagues and a greater voice in decision-making that will take place during the workshop.

8:00 Registration, Breakfast, and Welcome

9:00 Geologic, geophysical, geodynamic, and geomorphic background of ENAM – Appalachian, rift, and recent landscape evolution | Pazzaglia, Withjack, McKeon

10:20 Break

10:30 EarthScope and GeoPRISMS science strategies and rationale for ENAM workshop | Maggie Benoit

11:00 Student research presentations (poster and oral)

12:00 Field trip to Appalachian foreland, basin analysis reconstruction of the Appalachian range. (Box lunch provided) | Frank Pazzaglia

6:30 Student Dinner

6:00 Registration and Science workshop mixer. STEPS concourse A

 icon-download Download the compiled white papers

Kinematic reconstruction of the central US and conjugate northwest African margin | icon-file 300Kb Van Avendonk et al.

Deep-crustal seismic study of continental rifting in the Newfoundland Basin |  300KbVan Avendonk et al.

A central Appalachian EarthScope transect in Virginia: Examining upper mantle interaction with Paleozoic sutures, Eocene magmatism, and modern seimicity |  3MbBailey et al. 

Testing the lithospheric counterflow hypothesis |  1MbBeaumont et al.

Integrating lithospheric structure, mantle dynamics, and surface processes to investigate topographic and lithospheric evolution of the southeastern US continental margin |  600KbBenoit et al.

EarthScope in New England Appalachians: Structural inheritance and the long-term strenght of continental lithosphere |  500Kb Crespi et al.

Submarine groundwater discharge: linking the continental and oceanic hydropsheres |  500Kb Dugan et al.

Accretion of terranes and growth of continental crust along the southern margin of Laurentia during assembly of Pangea [and modifications by opening of the Gulf of Mexico] |  500Kb Dumond et al.

Slope failure control on margin morphology at the Cape Fear Slide |  500KbFlemings et al.

The role of magmatism in rifting: insight from the lithospheric mantle |  50KbGaherty et al.

GeoPRISMS Data Portal |  900Kb Goodwillie et al.

An REU site at James Madison University: understanding the Rift-to-Drift transition in Eastern North America and the North Atlantic |  200KbJohnson et al.

South Georgia Rift Basin: Rift Initiation and Evolution (RIE) Assessment through Controlled Source Seismology |  500Kb Knapp et al.

High-resolution marine magnetic anomaly data across the margin would delineate structures controlling lithospheric formation and rift localization |  1MbMiller et al.

Late Cenozoic stream incision in the Appalachian region |  300Kb Miller et al.

Evolution of continental crust through two Wilson cycles in ENAM |  700Kb Thomas et al.

Call for White Papers

The transportable array of EarthScope arrives in the eastern United States in 2012-13, and GeoPRISMS has identified the Eastern North America Margin (ENAM) as a primary site of the Rift Initiation and Evolution (RIE) initiative. Collectively, EarthScope and GeoPRISMS research spans the shoreline and, in doing so, provides an integrated framework for understanding the Appalachian mountain building processes, rift-initiation (including orogenic inheritance), and the evolution and structure of a mature continental margin. The associated broader impacts of natural hazards and assessment of the nation’s natural resources, including traditional and alternative sources of energy in the most densely populated part of the country, are fundamental to both programs.

The October 2011 Workshop has two main purposes. First, it will focus community effort and research approaches in the eastern United States, including identification of important EarthScope and GeoPRISMS RIE science targets. In particular, the GeoPRISMS RIE community could use the meeting to identify critical areas to target for focused research. Second, the workshop will establish research strategies that maximize EarthScope and GeoPRISMS synergies to address common research goals.

Scientists interested in participating in the development of the integrated science and implementation plan for ENAM are invited to submit White Papers. The White Papers will play an important role in the workshop outcomes, including guiding breakout discussions at the workshop, and they are thus an important mechanism for community input. White Papers should propose specific science objectives, show suitability for addressing the research themes outlined in the GeoPRISMS and EarthScope Science Plans, and consider the relative merits of PI-driven versus “community” approaches to collecting necessary data sets. Example White Paper topics could include specific scientific questions and/or targets in Eastern North America, potential “Discovery Corridors” (onshore and off), possible community experiments (including joint proposals between EarthScope, GeoPRISMS, or other partners), and implementation strategies for carrying out thematic studies. White Papers addressing the evolution of the passive margin may wish to make an explicit case for how they address one of more of the key RIE questions.

White papers should be submitted to the GeoPRISMS Office by September 15, 2011. In preparation, White Papers authors should consult relevant parts of the Earthscope Science Plan and the GeoPRISMS Science Plan linked below.

All White Papers will be made available to meeting participants and the community prior to the workshop.

Guidelines

White Papers submitted by proponent teams are preferred to ensure broader consensus, although individuals are also welcome to submit.

Graduate students and post-doctoral fellows are encouraged to participate in the process of assembling a white paper; similarly, PIs are encouraged to include students, post-docs, and young investigators in author teams.

Authors can contribute more than one white paper.

White Papers should be clear and succinct and are limited to 2 pages of text plus 1 page of figures and references.

White Papers can be submitted even if the authors are unable to attend the meeting.

White Papers that address the integration or complementarity of the EarthScope and GeoPRISMS communities and science goals are particularly encouraged.

The conveners reserve the right to restrict dissemination of papers deemed to be too narrow in scope or not aimed at goals of integrating resources of the relevant programs.

Please provide the following header information on each paper (see Word Template):

White Paper Title
Authors and Affiliations
Contact information
Proposed sites and/or themes addressed
Key types of existing or forthcoming data/infrastructure to build upon

Workshop Hotel: The Comfort Suites 120 W. Third St., Bethlehem, PA 18015 (610) 882-9700Workshop Meeting Venue: Lehigh University STEPS Facility Lehigh University 27 Memorial Drive West Bethlehem, PA 18015 (610)758-3000

Figure 1. Workshop attendees gather outside the STEPS facility at Lehigh University during the EarthScope-GeoPRISMS Science Workshop for Eastern North America.

Workshop attendees gather outside the STEPS facility at Lehigh University during the EarthScope-GeoPRISMS Science Workshop for Eastern North America.

An EarthScope- GeoPRISMS Science Workshop for Eastern North America (ENAM) was held at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, PA on October 27-29, 2011. Approximately 95 people were in attendance. Despite a poorly timed Nor’easter on the last day of the workshop – which ultimately led to four days of power outage in Bethlehem and interesting travel for the participants – the workshop was very successful. A consensus plan for the GeoPRISMS ENAM primary site was reached, and synergies with the EarthScope program were fully explored.

The scale, the complicated record of multiple Wilson cycles, and the along-strike geologic variations of ENAM made selecting a single focus area impractical. Consequently, the workshop identified three potential regions for GeoPRISMS focused research, and articulated the alignment with EarthScope priorities for each of those locations. Additionally, significant discussion addressed thematic and synoptic studies that are less site specific, but which also afford synergistic opportunities between GeoPRISMS and EarthScope science goals.

The three focus areas identified are:

(1) A long, NW-SE oriented swath from the Appalachian foreland in Kentucky to true oceanic crust offshore the Blake Plateau, through the city of Charleston, SC (“The “Charleston Swath”). This area presented clear opportunities for the GeoPRISMS and EarthScope communities to work together on a number of topics. In combination, onshore and offshore studies could address fundamental questions about orogeny, rifting, post-rifting, and neotectonic deformation. The swath includes a classic section through the Appalachian mountains (including the highest topography in the Appalachians), multiple accreted terranes, rifting recorded in the South Georgia basin onshore, effusive breakup magmatism beneath the Carolina trough offshore, two zones of known seismicity (Charleston and Eastern Tennessee), large landslides preserved on the slope and the extensive Blake Ridge gas hydrate province. Work in this area could connect to the funded OINK EarthScope project in the mid-continent, thereby forming a complete swath from the orogenic foreland to oceanic crust.

(2) A swath across the Canadian Appalachians to true oceanic crust offshore Nova Scotia. This area is critical to understanding magmatism as a fundamental control on the process of rifting: It contains the transition from magmatic (south) to amagmatic (north) rupture and continental breakup along eastern North America. Consequently, this study area provides the opportunity to determine the characteristics and causes of this transition (i.e., differences in lithospheric properties and rheologies, extension magnitudes). Attractive targets for the onland component are accretion of the northern Appalachian regions, strike-slip tectonism along terrane boundaries, the record of rifting in the Fundy basin, and the active seismicity of the Charlevoix region. The area has logistical advantages, including abundant offshore industry seismic-reflection data and government and academic seismic-refraction data and some onshore permanent seismic observatories. While the motivation for this study area comes primarily from magmatic-to-amagmatic transition recorded offshore, there was interest in extending the footprint of Transportable Array of USArray into New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, to provide the onshore context for an offshore OBS deployment.

(3) A mid-Atlantic focus area that stretches along strike from about Philadelphia, PA to Richmond, VA and across strike from the Appalachian Plateau to the offshore Baltimore Canyon and Carolina troughs. Onshore, this area offers numerous advantages to studying orogenesis and rifting, and is less affected by terrane accretion than the northern or southern Appalacians. As a corollary, the mid-Atlantic section of the Appalachian orogen provides opportunities to understand the transition between the southern and northern Appalachians. This area contains exposures of both Iapetan and Mesozoic rift margins, and it records a wide range of magmatism, valuable for timing constraints and geodynamic inferences. A key advantage of this area is that it is well suited for linked, interdisciplinary studies of geomorphology, Cenozoic basin development, and upper mantle structure and dynamics. Mantle imaging in this area has already begun, with a recently completed, year-long seismic deployment (TEENA).

In addition to these focus areas, there were two areas of interest from an EarthScope perspective.

First, the New England region was considered for studying orogenic and rift initiation processes. This area provides an extremely telescoped orogeny, the presence of island-arcs as accreted terranes, a major extensional basin, and the presence of an ancient hotspot track. Second, there was interest in extending the scope of the funded SESAME EarthScope project in a variety of ways, including studying the role of terrane (continental fragment) accretion, the role of Iapetan transform faulting on subsequent deformation, or the nature of incomplete rifting on the southern end of the Appalachians. In general, there was support for conducting multiple cross-strike and along-strike swaths through the Appalachian Mountains, in order to develop a time-integrated evolution of the entire mountain belt.

Finally, a model was proposed for future EarthScope community projects that could leverage academic resources and interest in ENAM including, for example, the relatively high number of four-year colleges in the region. The goal would be to enable inclusive participation of geoscientists, in particular, faculty who are experts in the regional tectonic evolution ENAM. One possibility would be to provide community resources for pursuing a variety of synoptic studies. Discussions also considered the next generation of EarthScope science projects, perhaps including extended backbone ENAM TA and PBO deployments.

The meeting attendees are thanked for their active participation and contributing to the spirit of consensus building on the GeoPRISMS implementation plan for the Eastern North American margin, and identifying opportunities for further engaging EarthScope. The graduate students, in particular, were actively engaged in the workshop process and their insights and input were formally presented and played a significant role in moving the discussion forward during the decision-making process. The speakers, break-out group leaders, and white paper authors all contributed to the success the workshop.

The conveners and selected break-out leaders plan to prepare a comprehensive workshop report for distribution by January 2012, and an updated draft of the GeoPRISMS ENAM science implementation plan by February 2012. The implementation plan will be made available for public comment prior to final release. It will serve as a guide for proposals submitted for the next NSF GeoPRISMS solicitation, July 1, 2012, and the next EarthScope solicitation deadline, July 16, 2012.

Workshop Conveners (in alphabetical order):

Frank J. Pazzaglia, Lehigh University
Peter Flemings, University of Texas at Austin
Vadim Levin, Rutgers University
Dan Lizarralde, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute
Basil Tikoff, University of Wisconsin
Martha Withjack, Rutgers University
Maggie Benoit, The College of New Jersey – Student Coordinator and Symposium Convener

2012 Planning Workshop for the Cascadia Primary Site


April 5-6, 2012
Portland, Oregon
Organized in collaboration with EarthScope

AnnouncementAgenda - Presentation archiveStudent SymposiumWhite Papersmore infoOutcomes

The GeoPRISMS and EarthScope National Offices and the conveners would like to thank all of you for contributing to a most productive Cascadia Science Workshop last week in Portland. The talks were outstanding and thought-provoking, the posters spanned the breadth of Cascadia and related science, and the special interest break-out sessions were stimulating and highly informative. We hope that the workshop and discussions surrounding it initiated new conversations, collaborations, and projects that will drive Cascadia science forward. The GeoPRISMS and EarthScope Offices are available to facilitate in any way we can.

The products of this workshop will include a comprehensive report of the topics addressed, along with directions for future research in Cascadia, and an updated Implementation Plan for the Cascadia Primary Site for GeoPRISMS. The availability of these documents will be announced on the meeting website, and through the EarthScope and GeoPRISMS listservs. Pending author’s approval, the workshop presentations will also be posted on-line. More information will be forthcoming.

Announcement

The Cascadia margin is one of the selected GeoPRISMS primary sites for the Subduction Cycles and Deformation (SCD) Initiative and the focus of the ongoing joint EarthScope-GeoPRISMS Cascadia Initiative (CI). The first phase of the CI Amphibious Array – including both the offshore and onshore deployments – is complete. Data from the onshore deployment already are flowing and those from offshore should become available in 2012. With many other onshore and offshore research efforts in process or planning stages, it is timely to hold a workshop to build synergies among communities, disciplines, and agencies with scientific interests in the area.

This workshop will take as its starting point the Cascadia SCD portion of the GeoPRISMS Science and Implementation Plans and the Earthscope Science Plan. The goals of the workshop will be to clarify common research objectives within Cascadia, addressing the range of interacting tectonic, magmatic, and surficial processes acting along the convergent margin, and to update implementation plans and timelines for GeoPRISMS and EarthScope research considering available resources and infrastructure.

Specific objectives of the workshop include:
  • Informing the broader geoscience community about the status of community experiments and new science activities and opportunities in the Cascadia area
  • Enhancing interdisciplinary interactions and collaborations in Cascadia
  • Encouraging new proponent teams to organize in advance of upcoming proposal deadlines
  • Updating the GeoPRISMS implementation plan for Cascadia, including thematic aspects of SCD science
  • Clarifying broader impacts and education opportunities associated with Cascadia research

We anticipate funding to support ~85 researchers with a diversity of interests to participate in this workshop. Post-docs, senior graduate students, and members of under-represented groups are especially encouraged to apply. Note, a student symposium is planned for April 4, before the workshop – more details will be announced soon. Applications should include a brief statement of interest and anticipated contribution to the workshop, and a short (1 to 2 page) CV.

The program will include a number of overview presentations on Cascadia and related MARGINS, GeoPRISMS, and EarthScope research programs, other major Cascadia experiments already or soon-to-be underway, break-out sessions, and plenary discussions. White papers will be solicited in advance of the workshop to ensure community input.

Workshop Conveners:

Geoff Abers (Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory)
Joan Gomberg (USGS)
Adam Kent (Oregon State University)
Katie Kelley (University of Rhode Island)
Harvey Kelsey (Humboldt State University)
Josh Roering (University of Oregon)
Anne Trehu (Oregon State University)
Kelin Wang (Pacific Geoscience Center)
Andrew Goodliffe, Student Symposium Convener

Registration & Student Symposium | Wednesday, April 4

5:30 Registration and Ice Breaker (at Marriot Waterfront)

Day 1 | Thursday, April 5

8:55-9:10 Introduction to the aims of the workshop and the GeoPRISMS Program | Julia Morgan (GeoPRISMS Office) 

7:30 Breakfast (at World Trade Center)

Moderators: Adam Kent, Katie Kelley
8:30 Welcome from the conveners, logistics, goals for the workshop
8:45 Comments from NSF representatives
9:00 Cascadia Crustal Evolution and Deformation
9:00 Evolution of the Cascadia convergent margin-an introduction |  7Mb –  Ray Wells
9:30 Cascadia pre-quaternary geologic context |  3Mb –  Anita Grunder

9:50 Holocene and recent volcanism in the Cascades |  2Mb –  Kathy Cashman

10:10 Discussion

10:30 Coffee break

Moderators: Anne Trehu, Kelin Wang
11:00 Earthquakes and Other Faulting Processes
11:00 Research on mega-thrust earthquakes in the Japan Trench and the Nankai Trough |  10MbShu-ichi Kodaira
11:30 Paleoseismic history of Cascadia from onshore and offshore record |  4Mb – Rob Witter
11:50 Seismic and aseismic processes from the modern record |  4Mb – Ken Creager
12:10 Discussion

12:30-1:30 Lunch

Moderators: Geoff Abers, Adam Kent
1:30 Large-scale and Deep Processes
1:30 Thermal-petrologic-fluid flow structure and dynamics of the subduction zones |  6Mb – Ikuko Wada
2:00 Geodynamic framework of the Pacific NW |  22Mb – Gene Humphreys
2:30 Structure, composition, and evolution of the incoming plate at the Cascadia Subduction Zone |  2Mb – Suzanne Carbotte
3:00 Generation of magmas in Cascadia |  3Mb – Tom Sisson
3:30 Discussion

Moderators: Joan Gomberg, Anne Trehu
3:50 Project Summaries: Ongoing studies in Cascadia and elsewhere
Cascadia Initiative – offshore update |  2Mb – Doug Toomey
Cascadia Initiative – onshore update |  4Mb – Richard Allen
IODP studies |  1Mb – Rob Harris
Cabled observatories, Canada  2Mb – Martin Heesemann
Cabled observatories, US |  6Mb – William Wilcock
Offshore GPS |  3Mb – Dave Chadwell
Mount St. Helens project |  2Mb – Alan Levander
Open-access Langseth cruise: Reflection imaging of the central Cascadia margin |  1Mb – Katie Keranen
Mocha Project |  4Mb – Adam Schultz
GeoPRISMS Portal and MGDS |  1Mb – Andrew Goodwillie

4:40 Poster Session

6:30 Conference dinner (at World Trade Center)
– Earth to Humans: The importance of connecting people with their planet | Ellen Morris Bishop

8:00 Poster Session w/ cash bar

8:00 Projects and Implementation Discussions
Objective: Break-out groups to discuss existing and planned projects, activities, opportunities and future directions. Reports will guide closing discussions on Day 2.
What infrastructure exists for Cascadia; what are associated opportunities?
What major research products and data streams will be available?
What gaps remain to be filled; what are future directions?
What challenges exist, and how can they be overcome?

(a) Cascadia Initiative & Amphibious Arrays | Richard Allen, Doug Toomey
(b) Volcano Imaging | Ken Creager, Olivier Bachman
(c) Cascadia Geohazards | Brian Sherrod, Roy Hyndman
(d) Energy & Mineral Potential | Andrew Meigs, Michael Rowe
(e) Education & Outreach | Bob Butler, Ellen Bishop
(f) GeoPRISMS Portal and MGDS | Andrew Goodwillie

Day 2 | Friday, April 6

7:30 Breakfast (at World Trade Center)

8:30 Introduction to Day 2

Moderators: Josh Roering, Harvey Kelsey
8:40 Sediment Transport, Accretion, and Subduction
8:40 Mass Balance and terrestrial surface processes |  4Mb Mark Brandon
9:10 Accretionary prism processes and comparison with other subduction zones | Lisa McNeill
9:40 Understanding the turbidite record: genesis, transport, and preservation |  3Mb David Piper
10:10 Discussion

10:30 Coffee break

11:00 Special Interest Discussion Groups
Objective: Break-out groups to discuss scientific topics, targets, and research approaches. Reports will guide closing discussions on Day 2.
What are the key exciting scientific questions that can be addressed in Cascadia?
What infrastructure exists in Cascadia research to address them?
What knowledge gaps remain to be filled; what are future research directions?
What challenges exist, and how can they be overcome?

11:00-11:45 – Session 1
(a) Subduction Zone Structure I: Anne Sheehan, Gary Egbert (Scribe: Rob Porritt)
Deep geophysical imaging (e.g., mantle wedge, slab), passive seismic, resistivity

(b) Faulting Processes I: David Schmidt, Harmony Colella (Scribe: Abhi Ghosh)
Megathrust processes, properties, and behaviors

(c) Sedimentary Processes: Chris Goldfinger, Becky Dorsey (Scribe: Karl Wegmann)

Sediment transport, linkages among hillslopes, estuaries, turbidite processes, preservation of extreme events (flooding, landslides, earthquakes)

(d) Volcanism and Volcanic Processes: Marc Parmentier, Sue de Bari (Scribe: Alison Koleszar)

(e) Distribution, composition, and output through time and space, correlations with seismic record, imaging and monitoring

11:45-12:30 – Session 2
(a) Subduction Zone Structure II: Tom Pratt, Helene Carton (Scribe: Lee Liberty)
Shallow imaging (forearc structure), active source, potential fields, resistivity

(b) Faulting Processes II: Rick Blakely, Sue Bilek (Scribes: Simon Engelhart)
Margin segmentation from modern, paleoseismologic and paleogeodetic perspectives, forearc and backarc deformation, intraplate faults
Note: We recognize that there may be considerable topical overlap between a and b. At the discretion of the discussion group chairs, these may be combined into a single group.

11:45-12:30 – Session 2 (cont.)
(c) Geodetic studies: Spahr Webb, Herb Dragert(Scribe: Jay Patton)
Present-day ground motions, on- and off- shore, causes and consequences

(d) Volatile Processes and Cycles: Glen Spinelli,Stacia Gordon (Scribe: Dan Ruscitto)
Fluids and melting, from trench to arc

12:30-1:30 Lunch

Moderators: Kelin Wang, Joan Gomberg
1:30 Cascadia Hazards Plenary Presentations
1:30 Implications for the built environment – hazard mapping |  3Mb – Art Frankel
1:45 Tsunami potential and modeling |  3Mb – George Priest
2:00 Volcanic Hazards |  2Mb – Seth Moran
2:15 Characteristics of the Earthquake Early Warning Problem in Cascadia |  2Mb – Ingrid Johanson

2:30 Special Interest Groups Reports

3:20 Coffee Break

Moderators: Katie Kelley, Josh Roering
3:40 Student Perspective
4:00 Implementation Discussion and Roadmap to the Future
4:00 Implementation Discussion Summaries, setting stage for
4:30 Future Research Directions and Opportunities, e.g.,
What are the key exciting scientific questions that can be addressed in Cascadia?
What infrastructure exists for Cascadia; what are associated opportunities?
What major research products and data streams will be available?
What gaps remain to be filled; what are future directions?
What interdisciplinary activities / collaborations will advance understanding of Cascadia?
What challenges exist, and how can they be overcome?

5:30 Wrap-up and Closure

6:30 Dinner on your own

GeoPRISMS Student Symposium for the New Zealand Primary Site

Marriott Waterfront, Portland, OR
Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Moderator: Andrew Goodliffe
7:30 Breakfast (at Marriott Waterfront)

8:00 Welcome and Symposium Objectives

8:10 Introduction to GeoPRISMS & EarthScope | Juli Morgan / Ramon Arrowsmith
8:30 Framework geology and seismicity of Cascadia | Anne Trehu
8:50 Paleoseismology, w Emphasis on Coastal Records | Harvey Kelsey
9:10 Surface Processes & Feedback in Cascadia | Karl Wegmann

9:30 Volcanism & Geochemical Processes in Cascadia | Adam Kent

9:50 Coffee Break (and Poster Session)

10:00 Student Poster Session with 2-3 min presentations at each poster

12:00 Pick-up Box Lunch, head to Field Trip

12-6:00 Portland Field Trip by Public Transit – Ray Wells & Ian Madin

6:00 Workshop Registration, Ice Breaker (at Marriott Waterfront)

7:00 Student Dinner (at Kells Irish Restaurant and Pub)

 icon-download Download the compiled white papers

A focused study of Cascadia upper-plate structure and its impact on subduction-zone segmentation |  700Kb – Anderson et al.

Potential contributions of Seafloor Geodesy to understanding slip behavior along the Cascadia Subduction Zone |  400Kb – Chadwell et al.

Long-term simultaneous imaging of slow and fast quakes using small-aperture seismic arrays |  100Kb – Ghosh et al.

GeoPRISMS Data Portal | Goodwillie et al.

Paleoseismology at the Central Cascadia Subduction Zone |  100Kb – Horton et al.

Determining Temperatures of the Eastern Edge of the Cascadia Subduction Zone: Shallow Water Heat Flow Measurements in Puget Sound |  500Kb – Johnson et al.

Thermal Structure of the Cascadia Subduction Zone on the Washington Margin |  300Kb – Johnson et al.

Constraining Fluid Sources and Fluxes Through the Cascadia Accretionary Prism – Impact on Volatile Cycling, Physical State, and Microbiology |  100Kb – Solomon et al.

Volcanic arcs through time: High-resolution transects across 40 million years of arc evolution in the Oregon Cascades |  200Kb – Streck et al.

Call for White Papers

Scientists interested in GeoPRISMS and EarthScope research in Cascadia are invited to submit White Papers in advance of the Cascadia Science Workshop. White Papers should propose specific science objectives and show suitability for addressing the research themes outlined in the GeoPRISMS and/or the EarthScope Science Plans, and for the GeoPRISMS Program, specifically the implementation plan relating to the Cascadia Primary Site.

Example White Paper topics could include implementation strategies for carrying out interdisciplinary research in Cascadia, or for thematic studies complementary to such investigations. To be most effective, White Papers should make an explicit case for how they address one of more of the key GeoPRISMS SCD questions or EarthScope and/or GeoPRISMS Science Plans.

White Papers will be made available to meeting participants and the community prior to the workshop, and will be used in the implementation strategy decision–making process during the workshop.

Guidelines

Deadline for submission: February 20, 2012

White Papers submitted by proponent teams are preferred to ensure broader consensus, although individuals are also welcome to submit

Authors may contribute more than one white paper

White Papers should be clear and succinct and are limited to 2 pages of text plus 1 page of figures and references

The conveners reserve the right to restrict dissemination of papers deemed to be too narrow in scope or not aimed at the implementation plan.

Please provide the following header information on each paper:

White Paper Title
Authors and Affiliations
Contact information
Proposed sites and/or themes addressed
Key types of existing or forthcoming data/infrastructure to build upon

Workshop Venue: Portland World Trade Center 121 SW Salmon St, 2WTC, Portland, OR 97204 Tel:(503) 464-8688
Workshop Hotel: Portland Marriott Downtown Waterfront 1401 SW Naito Parkway, Portland, Oregon 97201

2012 Planning Workshop for the East African Rift System Primary Site


October 25-27, 2012
Morristown, New Jersey

AnnouncementAgenda - Presentation archiveStudent SymposiumWhite Papersmore infoOutcomes

The GeoPRISMS Steering and Oversight Committee is pleased to announce a workshop to develop a detailed science plan for the GeoPRISMS East African Rift System (EARS) Primary Site. The East African Rift System was chosen as a primary site for GeoPRISMS because it offers significant opportunities to study a wide range of questions outlined in the GeoPRISMS Science Plan for the Rift Initiation and Evolution (RIE) Initiative. More details about GeoPRISMS science objectives in the East African Rift can be found in the GeoPRISMS Science Plan and the Draft Implementation Plan; these documents will serve as the starting point for this workshop.

The main goals of the workshop are to clarify the community research objectives in the EARS, to discuss candidate “Discovery Corridors,” to identify opportunities for international partnerships, and to develop a detailed Implementation Plan for GeoPRISMS research, considering the available resources and infrastructure, to guide GeoPRISMS proposers and reviewers. The success of GeoPRISMS studies in the East African Rift also will depend on developing strong partnerships with international communities with similar research interests.

The program will include a number of overview presentations on the EARS, along with plenary and break-out discussions, culminating in decisions regarding science implementation in the East African Rift. White papers will be solicited in advance of the workshop to ensure community input.

The meeting will take place in Morristown, NJ from October 25-27, with a graduate student symposium on Wednesday, October 24.

Researchers from all countries are encouraged to apply, independent of past involvement in GeoPRISMS. Post-docs, senior graduate students, and members of under-represented groups are especially encouraged to participate. Funding from NSF and other sources is expected to cover a significant fraction of travel and accommodation costs for ~80 participants with a diversity of interests, including limited funds for international attendees. Applications should include a brief statement of interest and anticipated contribution to the workshop and a short curriculum vitae.

Workshop Conveners:

Ramon Arrowsmith
Estella Atekwana
Maggie Benoit
Andrew Cohen
Rob Evans
Matthew Pritchard
Donna Shillington
Tyrone Rooney

Student Symposium | Wednesday, October 24

8:00 – 5:00 Graduate Student Symposium & Field Trip
5:30 Workshop Registration & Ice Breaker (with Cash Bar)
7:00 Graduate Student Dinner

Day 1 | Thursday, October 25

Moderators: Maggie Benoit, Tyrone Rooney
8:00 Opening remarks
· Welcome from NSF – B. Haq, J. Wade
· Introduction to GeoPRISMS – Julie Morgan
· Goals of meeting – Conveners

8:30 Introductory Talk: Overview of the EAR | Cindy Ebinger (U. Rochester)

9:00 Plenary Topic 1: How does the presence or absence of an upper-mantle plume influence extension?
a. Seismological imaging of plumes and associated magmatism in rifts |  12Mb Gabriel Mulibo and JP O’Donnell (Penn State U.)
b. Origin of magmas from geochemical perspective |  1MbTyrone Rooney (Michigan State)
c. Plume dynamics and surface uplift |  8Mb Sarah Stamps (Purdue U.)

9:45 Plenary Topic 2: How does the mechanical heterogeneity of continental lithosphere influence rift initiation, morphology, and evolution?
a. Mechanisms for thinning the lithosphere, including thermal/chemical erosion, and interaction with large scale lithospheric structures |  11Mb Ben Holtzman (LDEO)
b. Control of pre-existing structures on early rifting |  3MbAubreya Adams (Wash. U)
c. Geochemical heterogeneity of the lithosphere |  2Mb Wendy Nelson (U. Houston)

10:30 Coffee Break & Poster Session

Moderators: Matt Pritchard, Rob Evans
11:00 Plenary Topic 3: How is strain accommodated and partitioned throughout the lithosphere, and what are the controls on strain localization and migration?
a. Magmatism during rifting events |  1MbDavid Ferguson (LDEO)
b. Modeling and observations of faulting and magmatism during rifting |  2Mb Juliet Biggs (U. Bristol)
c. Active deformation processes |  1MbBecky Bendick (U. Montana)

11:45 Plenary Topic 4: What factors control the distribution and ponding of magmas and volatiles, and how are they related to extensional fault systems bounding the rift?
a. Geochemical studies of magmas and volatiles |  35MbTobias Fischer (U. New Mexico)
b. Geophysical imaging of magmas and fluids (MT, seismic) |  1Mb Derek Keir (Natl. Ocean. Centre, Southampton)
c. Shallow dynamics of magma chambers/dikes and eruptions |  1Mb Manahloh Bechalew (U. Rochester)

12:30 LUNCH

Moderators: Andrew Cohen, Estella Atekwana
1:45 Plenary Topic 5: How does rift topography, on either the continental- or basin-scale, influence regional climate, and what are the associated feedback processes?
a. Climate and tectonics and feedbacks |  3Mb Manfred Strecker (U. Potsdam)
b. Modeling perspective | Joellen Russell (U. Arizona)
c. Tectonics and sedimentation at basin scale |  24Mb Chris Scholz (Syracuse U.)

2:30 Pop-ups by Graduate Students

3:00 Introduction to BREAKOUT 1 – Prioritizing science objectives. Divide into groups based on science questions in the draft implementation plan. What are the highest-priority questions? What kinds of observations do we need to address them and what are the characteristics of places where they should be made? What kind of modeling/experimental work is needed?

3:15 Break & Poster Session

3:45 BREAKOUT 1 – Round 1

4:30 BREAKOUT 1 – Round 2

How does the presence or absence of an upper-mantle plume influence extension?
Leader: Rob Moucha
Scribe: Sara Mana

How does the mechanical heterogeneity of continental lithosphere influence rift initiation, morphology, and evolution?
Leader: Anne Egger
Scribe: Kate Selway

How is strain accommodated and partitioned throughout the lithosphere, and what are the controls on strain localization and migration?
Leader: Roger Buck
Scribe: Andrew Katunwehe

What factors control the distribution and ponding of magmas and volatiles, and how are they related to extensional fault systems bounding the rift?
Leader: Laurent Montesi
Scribe: Dorsey Wanless

How does rift topography, on either the continental- or basin-scale, influence regional climate, and what are the associated feedback processes?
Leader: Naomi Levin
Scribe: Gail Ashley

Moderators: Donna Shillington, Ramon Arrowsmith
5:30 Plenary Topic 6: Hazards and Resources in the EAR and Links to Rifting
a. Seismic hazard |  1MbAtaley Ayele (Addis Ababa U.)
b. Volcanic hazard |  3MbNicolas d’Oreye (Natl. Museum of Nat. Hist. Lux.) & Lukawa N’yombo (Goma Volcanic Observatory)
c. Oil/gas exploration |  14MbDozith Abeinomugisha (PEPD Uganda)

6:30 Adjourn for Day

7:00 Conference Dinner

8:00 Poster Session
He-Ne-Ar-CO2-N2 Isotope and Relative Abundance Characteristics of the East Africa Rift System (EARS) | icon-file 1.2Mb – David Hilton
Projects and Current Initiatives for Scientific Research and Hazard Assessment in the Albertine Rift | icon-file 2.7Mb – François Kervyn
Achieving Scientific Projects in Central Africa: Some Shared Experience |  3.6Mb – Nicolas D’Oreye
Volcano Monitoring in the Virunga Volcanic Province, DR Congo |   2.8 Mb – Nicolas D’Oreye
Distribution of Faults and Volcanic Centers in the Early Stages of Continental Breakup: Natron Basin, Tanzania |  285Kb – James Muirhead
Active Kinematics of Lithospheric Extension Along the East African Rift System |  610Kb – Robert Reilinger
Magma Sources Involved in the 2002 Nyiragongo Eruption, As inferred from an InSAR Analysis |  900Kb – Christelle Wauthier

8:00 GeoPRISMS Data Resources Mini-workshop |  1MbAndrew Goodwillie

Day 2 | Friday, October 26

Moderators: Rob Evans, Donna Shillington

8:00 Report from breakouts & plenary discussion

9:00 Plenary Topic 7: Synergies with other agencies / international projects

NSF/USAID PEER Program Annica Wayman (USAID) and DeAndra Beck (NSF)
Overview of recent and funded NSF programs |  1MbRob Evans (WHOI) and Donna Shillington (LDEO)
New NSF-IES (Integrated Earth Systems) and other programs |  1Mb Leonard Johnson and Jennifer Wade (NSF)
AfricaArray |  1Mb Andy Nyblade (Penn State U.)
Hominin Sites and Paleolakes |  1MbAndy Cohen (U. Arizona)
Lake Drilling Project |  2Mb Chris Scholz (Syracuse U.)
Afar consortium |  1Mb Kathy Whaler (Edinburgh)/Derek Keir (NOCS)
Summary of French programs |  1MbCecile Doubre (U. Strasbourg)
NASA |  1MbSimon Carn (Mich. Tech. U)
GEOBSNET |  1Mb François Kervyn (Royal Museum for Central Africa, Belgium)

10:30 Coffee Break & Poster Session

Moderators: Andrew Cohen, Rob Evans
11:00 Plenary Topic 8: African partnerships panel. (5 min presentations how to build successful, mutually beneficial collaborations in Africa, followed by plenary discussion

12:30 LUNCH

1:30 Quick Pop-Ups and Plenary Discussion

2:30 Introduction to BREAKOUT 2 – Implementation strategies. Divide into groups based on science questions in the draft implementation plan. In the context of high-priority science and critical observations/modeling from BREAKOUT 1, discuss implementation strategies for each question, including the best places in the EAR to implement science questions, opportunities to leverage other activities, and high-priority thematic studies.

2:45 BREAKOUT 2, Round 1

3:30 BREAKOUT 2, Round 2

How does the presence or absence of an upper-mantle plume influence extension?
Leader: Jim Gaherty
Scribe: Maryjo Brounce

How does the mechanical heterogeneity of continental lithosphere influence rift initiation, morphology, and evolution?
Leader: TBA
Scribe: Julie Elliot

How is strain accommodated and partitioned throughout the lithosphere, and what are the controls on strain localization and migration?
Leader: John Nabelek
Scribe: Erin DiMaggio

What factors control the distribution and ponding of magmas and volatiles, and how are they related to extensional fault systems bounding the rift?
Leader: Adam Soule
Scribe: Brandon Chiasera

How does rift topography, on either the continental- or basin-scale, influence regional climate, and what are the associated feedback processes?
Leader: Ramon Arrowsmith
Scribe: Amy Morrissey

4:15 Coffee Break

4:45 Reports from Breakout 2

5:30 Plenary Discussion

6:00 Adjourn for the Day

7:00 Dinner on your own

8:00 Poster Session

Day 3 | Saturday, October 27

8:00 Reports from Breakout 2

8:30 Plenary Discussion

9:00 Introduction to BREAKOUT 3 – Finalizing implementation plan. Divide into groups that represent the spectrum of science for the EAR. Discuss integrated strategies to accomplish the highest impact in the EAR, including the best locations for focused, multidisciplinary study, key observations, thematic studies and leveraging opportunities.

9:15 BREAKOUT 3

10:15 Graduate Student Perspective & Implementation Plan

10:45 Coffee Break and Poster Session

11:15 Reports from BREAKOUT 3 and final plenary discussion with decision making on areas for focused research and highest priority thematic studies.

11:45 Wrap-up discussion

12:00 Meeting Adjourns

12:00-6:00 Post-Meeting Field Trip, (Lunch Provided – Register with GeoPRISMS office)

GeoPRISMS Student Symposium for the East Africa Primary Site

  Cotton Building Room 217, Victoria University, Wellington, NZ
Sunday, April 14, 2013

8:00 -9:00 AM Breakfast and Registration

9:00 – 10:30 AM Plenary Session:

Introductions
Overview of GeoPRISMS and EARS Planning Meeting – Maggie Benoit and Juli Morgan
Overview of EARS Geophysics – Donna Shillington
Overview of EARS Geochemistry – Tyrone Rooney
Overview of EARS Surface Processes – Ramon Arrowsmith

10:30 – 12:00 PM Student Posters and Presentations

12:00 – 5:30 PM Field Trip to Newark Basin led by Martha Withjack and Roy Schlische

7:00 PM Student Dinner

 icon-download Download the compiled white papers

Landscape and lakescape evolution: source-to-sink study of geomorphic, tectonic, climatic, andvegetation interactions in a tropical rift basin (Lake Malawi) | icon-file 300Kb – Arrowsmith et al.

The Lake Tanganyika Drilling Project: A potential ~10 Ma continuous record of integrated tectonicand climatic history for the western African rift |  200Kb – Cohen et al.

Studying early stage of rifting in Northern Tanzania |  700Kb – Doubré et al.

The GeoPRISMS Dataportal |  200Kb – Goodwillie

Active Kinematics of Lithospheric Extension Along the East African Rift |  6Mb – Reilinger et al.

Geochemical and petrographic approaches for the study of rifting in the EAR |  60Kb – Rooney et al.

SEGMeNT: An NSF-Continental Dynamics project to study the weakly extended Malawi (Nyasa) Rift |  7Mb – Shillington et al.

Geodetic Constraints of Rift Initiation across the Somalia-Lwandle Plate Boundary in Madagascar |  600Kb – Stamps et al.

An Investigation of Continental Rift-Parallel Deformation |  400Kb – Stamps et al.

Call for White Papers

GeoPRISMS has identified the East African Rift System (EARS) as a primary site of the Rift Initiation and Evolution (RIE) initiative. GeoPRISMS research spans the shoreline and, in doing so, provides an integrated framework for understanding the effects of inherited lithospheric weakness, magmatism, volatiles, climate, and sedimentation on rift initiation and evolution. The associated broader impacts of natural hazards and assessment of geological resources, including traditional and alternative sources of energy, are significant.

The October 2012 Planning Workshop for the EARS Primary Site has two main purposes. First, it will focus community effort and research approaches in the EARS, including prioritization of important GeoPRISMS RIE science targets. In particular, the GeoPRISMS RIE community will use the meeting to identify critical areas for focused research. Second, the workshop will establish research strategies that maximize synergies between GeoPRISMS and ongoing international efforts to address common research goals.

Scientists interested in participating in the development of the integrated science and implementation plan for EARS are invited to submit White Papers in advance of that workshop. The White Papers will play an important role in the workshop outcomes and design, including guiding breakout discussions and speakers at the workshop, and they are thus an important mechanism for community input. White Papers should propose specific science objectives, show suitability for addressing the research themes outlined in the GeoPRISMS Science Plans, and consider the relative merits of PI-driven versus “community” approaches to collecting necessary data sets. Example White Paper topics could include specific scientific questions and/or targets in the Eastern Africa Rift System, potential “Discovery Corridors” and justifications for them, possible community experiments (including joint international proposals), and implementation strategies for carrying out thematic studies.

White papers should be submitted to the GeoPRISMS Office by September 15, 2012. In preparation, White Paper authors should consult relevant parts of the GeoPRISMS Science Plan and the Draft Implementation Plan.

All White Papers will be made available to meeting participants and the community prior to the workshop.

Guidelines

White Papers submitted by proponent teams are preferred to ensure broader consensus, although individuals are also welcome to submit.
Graduate students and post-doctoral fellows are encouraged to participate in the process of assembling a white paper; similarly, PIs are encouraged to include students, post-docs, and young investigators in author teams.

Authors can contribute more than one white paper.

White Papers should be clear and succinct and are limited to 2 pages of text plus 1 page of figures and references.

White Papers can be submitted even if the authors are unable to attend the meeting.

White Papers that address the integration or complementarity of GeoPRISMS with ongoing international projects are particularly encouraged.

The conveners reserve the right to restrict dissemination of papers deemed to be too narrow in scope or not aimed at goals of integrating resources of the relevant programs.

Please provide the following header information on each paper:

– White Paper Title
– Authors and Affiliations
– Contact information
– Proposed sites and/or themes addressed
– Key types of existing or forthcoming data/infrastructure to build upon

Helpful Links

Final participant list (last update 10-18-12)
Post meeting field trip – Saturday October 27, 12:00-6:00PM (lunch provided)
Conference Hotel and Venue: Hyatt Morristown

Meeting participants

The workshop conveners have provided the following synthesis of the outcomes of discussions that took place at the workshop, based on the informative talks and in-depth discussions that explored the full spectrum of scientific opportunities for GeoPRISMS in the EARS. Below, they offer a framework for the draft implementation plan, for your comment and feedback.

The initial model envisaged has a primary focus area within the EARS where significant interdisciplinary research could be linked to address the questions outlined in the science plan. Investigations in areas that complement work in the primary area and leverage previous and ongoing US and international projects are also integral to this model – we call these areas Collaborative Targets of Opportunity to emphasize that studies in these areas should focus on multi-disciplinary GeoPRISMS questions that cannot be answered in the primary focus area (as opposed to the wider range of projects that could be submitted for NSF Core funding or that might be supported by other NSF programs and initiatives). This initial model is a direct outcome of your meeting input, and we would greatly appreciate your feedback to help refine this draft plan.

Primary focus area: The Eastern Rift. The Eastern Branch of the EARS was identified in breakout groups and by the graduate students as a location where a focused inter-disciplinary effort could substantially impact our understanding of rift processes and effectively address the majority of the science questions that form the core of the science plan. This region would encompass the rift from the Tanzanian divergence in the south to Lake Turkana and southern Ethiopia to the north. Particular opportunities highlighted by discussion and relevant to the science plan include (but are not limited to) the role/origin of a plume in this part of this rift; the interaction of the rift and plume with major lithospheric structures; an active magmatic system; along-strike variations in the amount of cumulative extension and lithospheric thickness (from thin in the north to thick in the south); the preservation of a record of the interplay of climate and tectonics. The existing studies characterizing this region provide a rich framework upon which GeoPRISMS science will build.

Collaborative Targets of Opportunity:

Target 1: The Afar and Main Ethiopian Rift. This region is the focus of intense recent and ongoing international and US efforts in this part of the rift system. Further GeoPRISMS studies that could enhance our understanding of rifting processes include (but are not limited to) efforts that examine strain localization, and studies probing the origin and role of a plume in rifting.

Target 2: The Western Rift and SW branch. This site would provide the opportunity to examine the role of magmatism in rifting by comparing this less magmatic system with the highly magmatic Eastern Rift. It also contains the most weakly extended portions of the rift and thus can be used to tackle questions concerning incipient rifting. Finally, lakes along the Western Rift contain a rich record of tectonic and climatic events. New GeoPRISMS studies in this area can leverage recently funded NSF programs and other previous and ongoing tectonic and climate investigations.

Target 3: Synoptic investigations along the entire rift. As identified in many discussions at the workshop, there are questions in the science plan that are best addressed by examining the rift as a whole. These concern rift-wide variations in the origin and timing of volcanism, the strain field along and across the rift and large scale structure and dynamics underpinning the rift system. Thus, key components of the implementation plan should include broad and open data assimilation efforts, strategic infilling of climatic, geochemical, and geophysical observations, and modeling and experimental work, which would provide a framework for the focused investigations along the rift.

Feedback on this draft framework is welcome – please feel free to contact any of the conveners below with your input, and you can send your comments to info@geoprisms.nineplanetsllc.com. The next step in this process is to use this framework to write an implementation plan for GeoPRISMS science in the East Africa Rift based on the discussion and input received at the workshop. This process will involve soliciting more community feedback and NSF advice. We will circulate a draft version of the implementation plan to the community for further input.

In addition, we plan to reach out to more colleagues in Africa by summarizing the proposed implementation plan at the upcoming Colloquium of African Geology in January 2013.

 icon-chevron-right Photos from the workshop